EDTA Titration calculation overlook needed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the concentrations of Al2(SO4)3 and NiSO4 in a diluted solution after an EDTA titration. Initial calculations for moles of EDTA and the subsequent back titration with Cu2+ were presented, but several errors were identified. Corrections highlighted that the moles of Al3+ should be halved to account for the stoichiometry of Al2(SO4)3, leading to a recalculated mass of 44.48 mg for Al2(SO4)3 in the original sample. The final concentrations were adjusted to 1.779 mg/ml for Al2(SO4)3 and 0.6808 mg/ml for NiSO4. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding stoichiometry in titration calculations.
ssb
Messages
119
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



25.00 Ml sample of a solution of Al_2(SO4)3 and NiSO4 was diluted to 500.0 mL and the Al^3+ and Ni^2+ in a 25.00 mL aliquat were complexed by addition of 40.00 mL of 0.01175 M EDTA in a pH 4.8 buffer.

The excess EDTA was then back titrated with 10.07 mL of 0.00993 M Cu^2+. an excess of F- was then added to the solution to displace the EDTA that was bouned to the Al^3+. This liberated EDTA consumed 26.30 mL of 0.00993 M Cu^2+.

Calculate the mg/ml of Al2(SO4)3 (342.17 g/mol) and NiSO4 (154.75 g/mol) in the sample


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Calculate moles EDTA = 0.040 L * 0.01175 M = 0.0047 mol EDTA

Calculate moles of Excess EDTA 0.01007 L * 0.00993 M = .000099995 moles excess EDTA

Calculate Moles EDTA reacted with Al^{3+} and Ni^{2+} = 0.0047 - .000099995 = 0.00037 mol total EDTA used

Moles Al^{3+} comsumed = 0.02630 L * 0.00993 M = 0.00026 moles AL^{3+} consumed

moles Ni^{2+} consumed = 0.00037 mol EDTA - 0.00026 mol Mol Al^{3+} = 0.00011 mol Ni^{2+}

Calculate mass Al_2(SO_4)_3 = 0.00026 mol * 342.17 g/m = 0.08896 grams = 8.896 mg

Calculate mass NiSO_4 = 0.00011 mol * 154.75g/m = 0.01702 g = 1.702 mg

Mg/Ml Al_2(SO_4)_3 = 8.896/25.00 = 0.3558 mg/ml

Mg/Ml NiSO_4 = 1.702/25.00 = 0.0681 mg/ml

Do my calculations look correct? sig figs? If so I think I am getting the hang of this stuff
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not bad, but not perfect either.

0.00026 moles of Al3+, not Al2(SO4).

You took 25/500 of the original sample.

0.017 g is not 1.7 mg
 
Borek said:
Not bad, but not perfect either.

0.00026 moles of Al3+, not Al2(SO4).

You took 25/500 of the original sample.

0.017 g is not 1.7 mg

Borek
--
equation balancer and stoichiometry calculator

Calculate moles EDTA = 0.040 L * 0.01175 M = 0.0047 mol EDTA

Calculate moles of Excess EDTA 0.01007 L * 0.00993 M = .000099995 moles excess EDTA

Calculate Moles EDTA reacted with Al^{3+} and Ni^{2+} = 0.0047 - .000099995 = 0.00037 mol total EDTA used

Moles Al^{3+} comsumed = 0.02630 L * 0.00993 M = 0.00026 moles AL^{3+} consumed

moles Ni^{2+} consumed = 0.00037 mol EDTA - 0.00026 mol Mol Al^{3+} = 0.00011 mol Ni^{2+}

CORRECTION step:
Convert moles Al_2(SO_4)_3 into moles Al^+
Al_2 ----> 2Al^+ + 2e^- therefore there is one mole of Al_2(SO_4)_3 for every 2 moles of Al^+

Calculate mass Al_2(SO_4)_3 = (0.00026* mol *Al^+) (\frac {1 mol Al_2(SO_4)_3} {2 mol Al^+} )* (342.17 g/m) = 0.04448 grams = 44.48 mg

Calculate mass NiSO_4 = 0.00011 mol * 154.75g/m = 0.01702 g = 17.02 mg

If there were 44.48 mg Al_2(SO_4)_3 in 25.00 mL then there are 889.6 mg Al_2(SO_4)_3 in 500 mL

And if there were 17.02 mg NiSO_4 in 25.00 mL then there are 34.04 mg NiSO_4 in 500 mL

Mg/Ml Al_2(SO_4)_3 = 889.6 mg / 500.0 ml = 1.779 mg/ml

Mg/Ml NiSO_4 = 34.04/500.0 = 0.6808 mg/ml
 
What is Al+? Where did you get it from? And what for? And what is Al2? And this redox reaction... Sorry, but it looks like you are trying to solve titration questions having no idea about the most basic ideas.

17.02 in 25 doesn't mean 34.04 in 500.

Note: I am not checking everything, I am not calculating everything by myself, I am just writing about things obvious enough to be spotted at the first sight.

Too much spoonfeeding.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top