Engineering EE Design Calcs: Mastery Expected? Textbook Examples?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the balance between theory and practical application in "The Art of Electronics" (AoE). While AoE primarily focuses on descriptive content rather than extensive mathematical equations, it serves as a broad introduction to various electrical engineering topics. The authors do not assume that readers are already fluent in complex design calculations, as the book aims to clarify common misconceptions in the field. For those seeking deeper mathematical insights, traditional undergraduate electrical engineering textbooks are recommended as more suitable resources for advanced calculations and theoretical understanding. The conversation highlights the differing needs of practitioners, with some preferring the artistic aspects of electronics, while others seek scientific and mathematical rigor.
yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
Looking through the Art of Electronics, I barely see any equations, mostly description.

However, checking out this video, we get a whole page of calculations.

Are the authors of AoE expecting that practitioners are already fluent in these design calculations? Are there examples of such calculations, in textbooks? Perhaps in more advanced monographs instead of general circuit theory books?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 'Art of Electronics' becomes the 'science of electronics' when mathematics becomes involved.
Some people appreciate only the art, some understand the science, and some only the mathematics.
Each group requires a different approach.
 
  • Like
Likes tech99 and vanhees71
yucheng said:
Are the authors of AoE expecting that practitioners are already fluent in these design calculations?
I don't think so. The AoE is more of a broad introduction to many EE topics without going into a lot of depth. And one emphasis of the book is to expose many misconceptions that EEs can often have.

If you want a more in-depth EE learning resources, just look at typical textbooks for EE undergraduate courses.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top