Effect of frequency & Intensity on number of photons

Nancee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Electromagnetic radiation of wavelength λ and Intensity I, when incident on a metal surface, causes n electrons to be ejected per unit time. The maximum kinetic energy of the electrons is Emax.

State and explain the effect, if any on n and Emax when the wavelength λ is reduced but the intensity I is unchanged.

Homework Equations


E=hf, and I'm not sure what else

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved this question with 2 different teachers, the first said that n will not change as I is unchanged. The other said that n will reduce because:
number of photons=Intensity/energy of 1 photon
I trust both teachers so I'm really confused now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nancee said:
The other said that n will reduce because:
number of photons=Intensity/energy of 1 photon
I think that one of your teacher's misread the question because this is faulty logic. The question explicitly states that the intensity remains constant.
 
Hootenanny said:
I think that one of your teacher's misread the question because this is faulty logic. The question explicitly states that the intensity remains constant.

I happen to agree with that teacher and disagree with the first one!


yes, the intensity stays the same. But if you decrease lambda, you increase the energy of each photon.
Therefore, in order to get the same intensity there must be fewer photons present. Therefore fewer electrons will be ejected.
 
kdv said:
I happen to agree with that teacher and disagree with the first one!


yes, the intensity stays the same. But if you decrease lambda, you increase the energy of each photon.
Therefore, in order to get the same intensity there must be fewer photons present. Therefore fewer electrons will be ejected.
You are of course correct, scratch what I said. I apologise for any confusion. Perhaps it's time for a rest... :redface:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top