Effective mass of Dirac electron increased by electrostatic potential?

johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
The Dirac electron in the Higgs vacuum field v and an electromagnetic field with vector potential A_\mu is described by the following equation:

i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi = g v \psi + e \gamma_\mu A^\mu \psi

where g is the coupling constant to the Higgs field and e is the coupling constant to the electromagnetic field.

Let us assume that we are in the rest frame of the electron so that:

\partial_x=\partial_y=\partial_z=0

Let us also assume that there is only an electrostatic potential A_0=\phi so that:

A_x = A_y = A_z = 0

So the simplified Dirac equation is now:

i \gamma^0 \partial_t \psi = g v \psi + e \gamma_0 \phi \psi

Let us choose the Weyl or Chiral basis so that:

\gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I \\ I & 0 \end{pmatrix}

where I is the 2\times2 unit matrix.

In this representation:

\psi=\begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix}

where \psi_L and \psi_R are left-handed and right-handed two-component Weyl spinors.

Subtituting into the simplified Dirac equation above we get:

i \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I \\ I & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \partial \psi_L / \partial t \\ \partial \psi_R / \partial t \end{pmatrix} = g v \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix} + e \phi \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I \\ I & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix}

This equation separates into two equations of two-component Weyl spinors:

i \partial \psi_R / \partial t = g v \psi_L + e \phi \psi_R

i \partial \psi_L / \partial t = g v \psi_R + e \phi \psi_L

Now let us add these two equations together to obtain:

i \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (\psi_L + \psi_R) = (g v + e \phi)(\psi_L + \psi_R)

My question is this:

Does the state \psi_L + \psi_R describe an electron with an effective mass given by gv + e \phi?

Does the presence of an electrostatic field increase the electron's mass over and above the mass induced by the Higgs vacuum field alone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johne1618, Mass is more than just "energy at rest". To define what the mass is, you need to see how the energy changes when the object is slowly moving (as in p2/2m.) The nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac equation is a thoroughly studied topic. I suggest you google for material on the Foldy Wouthuysen representation.
 
Prof Susskind has kindly answered my question in an attachment. Adding a constant potential is equivalent to an overall phase shift and has no effect on the electron's equation of motion.

The file is attached to a reply to my similar thread in the Particle Physics Forum.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=562314
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top