Efficiency of the Stirling Cycle: Examining the Debate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency of the Stirling cycle, highlighting a formula for efficiency that considers heat flow and volume ratios. A debate arises between the calculated efficiency and a teacher's perspective, which emphasizes practical considerations of heat storage and flow in the system. The teacher argues that the heat flowing out can be stored, thus simplifying the efficiency calculation to resemble that of the Carnot cycle. However, the original poster questions whether it is correct to treat the gas and storage device as a single system, emphasizing the importance of heat flow to the gas. The conversation reveals confusion over terminology, particularly the term "isochoric," and its relevance to the Stirling engine's operation.
Vegeta
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I've calculated the efficiency of the Stirling cycle like

\eta=\frac{R(T_H-T_L)\ln\left(V_2/V_1\right)}{RT_H\ln\left(V_2/V_1\right)+C_{mV}(T_H-T_L)}

Where V_2>1. It's also derived http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~broholm/l39/node5.html" .
But my ("Highschool", or secondary school) teacher says that it can't be expressed that way, and is therefore wrong. Because she is considering how the Stirling engine works in practice. She says that because the heat that flows OUT of the system, from the isochoric proces, can be "stored" in some sort of heat storage device (the last animation here, called http://science.howstuffworks.com/stirling-engine.htm/printable" ), then you don't need to take the positive heat flow TO the system, into account, when calculating the efficiency. Because that energy is stored, and doesn't need to be heated from the fuel. By this way, the efficiency of the stirling cycle becomes \eta=1-T_C/T_H, i.e. the efficiency for the Carnot cycle.
But isn't it incorrect to consider the gas AND the "storage device" as one system, because there still is a heat flow (positive and negative) to the gas. Isn't it the heat flow to GAS that matters, when calculating the efficiency?!
And they've also derived that (the one above) formula for the efficiency of a stirling engine, in "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" By Fishbane, Gasiorowicz and Thornton, extended version.

But what is correct? :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Vegeta said:
IShe says that because the heat that flows OUT of the system, from the isochoric proces, can be "stored" in some sort of heat storage device...

I looked up "isochoric" and got:


The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search box to the right.

Suggestions for isochoric:

1. isocaloric
2. isochron
3. ascorbic
4. isogonic
5. ozokerite
6. ossicular
7. Iscariot
8. Ysyk-Kol
9. ozokerites
10. ozocerite
 
Looking at your link, I see that the person who wrote it is working toward analyzing the stirling as a refridgeration device. In this configuration the engine is operated by an outside motor or engine to increase the temperature difference between the hot and cold end, and the cold end is then used to cool something. In this configuration the stirling engine is a heat pump and not really a stirling engine anymore. I think this is very likely the source of the confusion between you and your teacher.
 
"isochor" = constant volume. It wasn't even in our undergrad textbook, our professor mentioned it in passing.
 
rachmaninoff said:
"isochor" = constant volume. It wasn't even in our undergrad textbook, our professor mentioned it in passing.
Thanks, rachmaninoff. I was pretty much baffled. Webster's usually has even obscure words.
 
Yes, I thought the whole point of dicitionaries was, obscure words.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top