Efficient Biology Dilution Techniques for Accurate Results | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter poli275
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biology Dilution
AI Thread Summary
To achieve a 1:10 dilution of blood with saline, the correct method is to mix 1 cm3 of blood with 10 cm3 of saline, resulting in a total volume of 11 cm3. The original poster mistakenly diluted 1 cm3 of blood with only 9 cm3 of saline, which does not meet the specified dilution ratio. While the difference in final concentrations may be minor for some applications, accuracy is crucial for precise analytical work. Clarification was provided that the intended dilution should yield a total of 20 cm3 of the blood solution. Proper mixing techniques are essential for reliable results in biological experiments.
poli275
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here goes the question: I was told to dilute blood with saline solution, in the ratio of 1 part of blood to 10 parts of saline. I need around 20 cm3 of the blood solution.


2. The attempt at a solution

I did it by placing 1 cm3 of blood into a testube, then follow by 9 cm3 of saline solution. Is my way correct? Or I'm suppose to mix 1 cm3 of blood with 10 cm3 of saline?

Thanks for helping :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would take 1 mL of blood and 10 mL of saline, that's what you were told to do.

1:9 would work if you were asked to dilute ten times.

Not that that matters much (unless you are doing some precise analytical work). Difference between final concentrations is in the 1% range.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top