Efficiently Shorten Your Boat Trailer for Winter Storage | 5" Aluminum I-Beams

  • Thread starter Thread starter pjm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Trailer
AI Thread Summary
Shortening a boat trailer for winter storage raises significant safety concerns, particularly regarding structural integrity and load distribution. The proposed method involves cutting and splicing the aluminum I-beams, which could introduce stress concentrations and potentially void insurance. Alternatives such as modifying the garage or using a cradle to hoist the boat are suggested to avoid cutting the trailer. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful engineering and consideration of safety factors before proceeding with any modifications. Ultimately, exploring all storage options is advised to prevent compromising the trailer's structural safety.
  • #51
Now you are getting somewhere. Trimming edge of girders to 4.91 inches from 5 inches, while adding 1/4 inch Al plate - A problem? not to me, the "amateur but practical engineer". Just put another small piece of Al plate for a spacer on top of the (removable) tongue when it is replaced and before the tower bolts are retightened. This keeps it from collapsing 1/4 inch down onto the tongue.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #52
pjm: Checker plate is too weak. It cannot be used as a replacement for the I-beam splice top plate. I-beam splice components are primary structural components, whereas checker plate is not. Furthermore, the rough surface of checker plate would cause uneven seating of the I-beam splice washers; the washers need to be perfectly level on a flat, smooth surface, to prevent prying on the bolt head.
 
  • #53
nvn said:
pjm: Checker plate is too weak. It cannot be used as a replacement for the I-beam splice top plate. I-beam splice components are primary structural components, whereas checker plate is not. Furthermore, the rough surface of checker plate would cause uneven seating of the I-beam splice washers; the washers need to be perfectly level on a flat, smooth surface, to prevent prying on the bolt head.

NVN: OK I get the picture. Incidently, what was the reason for reducing the bolt size in your last message. Thanks again
PJM
 
  • #54
pjm: The smaller the bolt size, the better (if adequate), because you want to remove as little of the I-beam flange material as possible. Even 0.3125-18 UNC, grade 8 bolts, torqued to 28 N*m (unlubricated), might work, and might be better, because they would remove less flange material. Or, if you use 0.3750-16 UNC bolts, intuition tells me you could probably omit one column of the bolts shown in post 49, which would still be twelve bolts holding each I-beam, instead of eighteen. And t1 = t2 = t3 = 5 mm might work.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top