EFields of Insulating hallow sphere around conductive hallow sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter ParoXsitiC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric fields and potential differences for an insulating hollow sphere and a concentric conducting shell. The insulating sphere has a non-uniform density and a net charge of +10.0 microC, while the conducting shell carries a charge of -20.0 microC. Participants clarify the use of Gaussian surfaces for determining electric fields, noting the importance of using the correct surface area formula. There is confusion regarding the interpretation of "net charge" and the correct radii values, which leads to a discussion on whether the electric field should be treated as constant or variable with respect to radius. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful application of formulas and concepts in electrostatics.
ParoXsitiC
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a insulating hollow sphere of radius who's inner radius is 0.04 m and outside radius is 0.08 m. It's density is not uniform and is represented by \rho = 0.0211 \mu C / m^{3.5} * \sqrt{r}. It has a net electric charge of +10.0 microC. There is a concentric conducting shell of inner radius 0.12 m and outer radius 0.16 m. It's net electric charge is -20.0 micro C

Find the inner and outer electric fields of both spheres

Homework Equations



\Phi = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{a} = \frac{q _{enclosed}}{\epsilon _{0}}
E = \frac{q _{enclosed}}{\epsilon _{0}}*\frac{1}{A}

\epsilon _{0} = 8.85 * 10^{-12}

q _{enclosed} = \int \rho dV

The Attempt at a Solution



A _{1} = 2\pi r = 2\pi(0.04m) = 0.08m\pi
A _{2} = 2\pi r = 2\pi(0.08m) = 0.16m\pi
A _{3} = 2\pi r = 2\pi(0.12m) = 0.24m\pi
A _{4} = 2\pi r = 2\pi(0.16m) = 0.32m\pi

E_{1} = \frac{0}{\epsilon _{0}}*\frac{1}{0.08m\pi} = 0

E_{2} = \frac{10 \mu C}{\epsilon _{0}}*\frac{1}{0.16m\pi} = 2.25 MN/C

E_{3} = \frac{10 \mu C}{\epsilon _{0}}*\frac{1}{0.24m\pi} = 1.50 MN/C

E_{4} = \frac{-20 \mu C}{\epsilon _{0}}*\frac{1}{0.32m\pi} = -2.25 MN/C

I thought the outside of the insulator should be equal to inside of conductor that somehow the A won't matter?

Also I wasn't sure if "net charge" meant the just conductor itself has a net charge of -20 uC [thus q enclosed= 10 uC (insulator) - 20 uC (conductor)= -10 uC] or if "net charge" meant all charges added up (10 uC + -30 uC = -20 uC)-----------------

Homework Statement



Using the same example, find the potential difference in KV for the following ranges

0 < r < 0.04 m
0.04 m < r < 0.08 m
0.08 m < r < 0.12 m
0.12 m < r < 0.16 m
0.16 m < r < infinity

Homework Equations

potential difference = ΔV = - \int \vec{E} \cdot dr = -E \int_{r_{intial}}^{r_{final}} dr = -E Δr

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the formula for area A1 etc. again?
 
A1 is just the area of the Gaussian surface, which I believe in this case would be 2 * pi * radius in the

\Phi = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}

Since we picked a surface that E is constant we can pull it out:

\Phi = \vec{E_{1}} \cdot \int d\vec{A_{1}}

\Phi = \vec{E_{1}} \cdot \vec{A_{1}}

\Phi = E_{1} * A_{1} * cos (0)

\Phi = E_{1} * A_{1}

Set E_{1} * A_{1}equal to \frac{q _{enclosed}}{\epsilon _{0}} and get E by itself:

E_{1} = \frac{q _{enclosed}}{\epsilon _{0}}*\frac{1}{A_{1}}

Mmm.. I think i was suppose to use the surface area of a sphere and not a circle. 4*pi*r^2 and not 2*pi*r
 
Last edited:
ParoXsitiC said:
Mmm.. I think i was suppose to use the surface area of a sphere and not a circle. 4*pi*r^2 and not 2*pi*r

Good bet!
 
Is it being setup right for the most part? Ignoring the Area mistake
 
ParoXsitiC said:
Is it being setup right for the most part? Ignoring the Area mistake

The question says "radii of 0.4m and 0.8m" yet then you talk about radii of 0.04m and 0.08m. Which is it?
 
rude man said:
The question says "radii of 0.4m and 0.8m" yet then you talk about radii of 0.04m and 0.08m. Which is it?

Sorry I typed the question from memory. It was 0.04 and 0.08.
 
Your approach is close, but not quite right. The electric field is going to vary with r. You should be finding E(r), not constant values.
 
Back
Top