Eigenfunctions, eigenstates and eigenvalues

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the operator A_hat defined as exp(b*(d/dx)) and its implications for the eigenstate ψ(x) with eigenvalue λ. Participants are exploring how the function ψ(x) behaves as x increases by multiples of b, specifically how it transforms under the operator. There is a focus on applying the eigenvalue equation to understand the dependence of ψ on x. The conversation highlights the importance of using LaTeX for clarity in quantum mechanics discussions. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical relationship between the operator and the eigenstate's behavior.
Harper
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem states consider A_hat=exp(b*(d/dx)). Then says ψ(x) is an eigenstate of A_hat with eigenvalue λ, then what kind of x dependence does the function ψ(x) have as x increases by b,2b,...?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Started out by doing (A_hat)ψ(x+b), turned that into (A_hat)ψ(x)+(A_hat)ψ(b). Not sure where to go from there and/or how to incorporate λ.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you write out the eigenvalue equation?
Note: you are asked what happens with ##\psi(x)\to\psi(x+nb): n=1,2,3,\cdots##
ie - how does ##\psi## depend on ##x##?

Do I read this correctly: ##\hat A = e^{b\frac{d}{dx}}## ??
 
  • Like
Likes Harper
Yes you read it correctly and no I didn't write that out.
 
Hey thanks for the tool and I think I have it figured out. Thank you for the help.
 
Well done - what did you figure out (just for other people stuck on the same thing...)?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top