Eigenstates of S^2: Calculating Eigenvalue for a Quantum System

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsForums
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenstates
PhysicsForums
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

I need to show: S^2 \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right) has an eigenvalue of zero.

The attempt at a solution

S_1^2 \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right)=\hbar^2 \frac{3}{4} \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right)

S_2^2 \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right)=\hbar^2 \frac{3}{4} \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right)

2S_{1z}S_{2z} \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right)=-\hbar^2 \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right)

\left( S_{1+}S_{2+}+S_{1-}S_{2-} \right) \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right)=0

As you can see, these values do not add up to zero. \hbar^2 \frac{3}{4} + \hbar^2 \frac{3}{4} -\hbar^2 \frac{1}{2} =2 \hbar^2

I am not sure where my calculations went off, if you would like to see more work, please ask.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
S_1x S_2x should equal S_1z S_2z.
Do it more carefully.
 
Your result is wrong because:

<br /> \left( S_{1x}S_{2x}+S_{1y}S_{2y} \right) = \left( S_{1+}S_{2-}+S_{1-}S_{2+} \right)<br />

so that
<br /> \left( S_{1+}S_{2-}+S_{1-}S_{2+} \right) \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right)= -\left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \alpha(1) \beta(2) - \beta(1) \alpha(2) \right] \right)<br />

You also summed in the wrong way all the eigenvalues. You have:
<br /> \hbar^2 \frac{3}{4} + \hbar^2 \frac{3}{4} -\hbar^2 \frac{1}{2} =1 \hbar^2 <br />

If you sum the new -1 value got from the correct representation of S operators you get 0.


(Sorry for the top up, just found a wrong answer and felt like to provide the correct solution :))
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top