Eigenvalues and diagonalizability

  • Thread starter Thread starter fk378
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0
This is a concept question..
I'm having trouble understanding why for an n x n matrix A, in order to have eigenvalues, it must have linearly dependent columns (so that a nontrivial solution exists), but for the same A, in order to be diagonalizable, the columns must be linearly INdependent.

The basis for the eigenspace of the former would be the null space, but for the latter, the basis would be the column space since no free variables exist.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may be difficult to understand because neither of those statements is true. If the columns (or rows) are linearly independent, then it has an INVERSE. A noninvertible matrix can have plenty of eigenvalues. Nor do the columns have to be independent for it to be diagonalizable. The zero matrix is perfectly diagonalizable.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top