Eigenvalues/Eigenstates of Spin Operator S in xz Plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the eigenvalues and eigenstates of the spin operator S for an electron, specifically when the direction of the unit vector n is constrained to the xz plane. The context is rooted in quantum mechanics, particularly in the study of angular momentum and spin operators.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the quantum number m and its implications in the equations provided. There is confusion regarding the factor of 1/2 in the equations and its consistency across different representations of m.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the definitions and implications of quantum numbers in the context of the equations. Some have suggested that there may be a typographical error in the equations, while others are clarifying the notation used for m.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted inconsistency in the notation of m between the two equations presented, leading to confusion about its interpretation as either a quantum number or a projection of angular momentum.

rsaad
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the eigenvalues and eigenstates of the spin operator S of an electron in the direction
of a unit vector n; assume that n lies in the xz plane.

Homework Equations



S|m>= h m|m>


The Attempt at a Solution



This question is from Zettili QM and they have written:

n.S|m>= (h/2) m|m>

I do not understand why are they taking a half.
If I take m=1/2 in S|m>= (h/2) m|m>, I get h/4 but the answer should be h/2, by using S|m>= h m|m>.
So where am i going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m is the quantum number. you need to check its definition
 
Of course it is a quantum number but why is there a half?
 
It's probably just a typo. It doesn't really matter, though. It just means the quantum numbers are ##\pm1## instead of ##\pm 1/2##.
 
I see now. The notation in the two equations is not consistent.
S|m>= h m|m>
n.S|m>= (h/2) m|m>
In the second equation, m is a 'quantum number' (i.e. integer), while in the first equation I guess you could interpret m as the value of the projection of angular momentum, in natural units.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K