Eigenvalues/functions of a mixed potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdwood983
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixed Potential
jdwood983
Messages
382
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the first two energy eigenfunctions and eigenvalues for a particle in a potential

<br /> V(x)=\frac{1}{2}m\omega_0^2\left(x^2-2cx\right)<br />



Homework Equations


<br /> H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+V(x)=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega_0^2\left(x^2-2cx\right)<br />

<br /> -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x^2}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega_0^2x^2\psi(x)-m\omega_0^2cx\psi(x)=E\psi(x)<br />


The Attempt at a Solution



I think what is confusing me is having the mixed potential, which is the whole point of the problem. I have tried using a completing the square and making the substitution of

<br /> \frac{1}{2}m\omega_0^2\left(x^2-2cx\right)\rightarrow\frac{1}{2}m\omega_0^2\left(u^2-c^2\right)<br />

but not really sure where this leads me (thought I might've ended up with a Bessel function or. I also tried solving it without substitution but end up with a quadratic in x differential equation

<br /> y&#039;&#039;+(ax^2-bx-c)y=0<br />

but unsure of where to start with this as wikipedia says this is the Weber-Hermite function, but I don't know what to do with this, at least not from what wiki says.

Any pointers as to where I should go from either starting point? (Or perhaps a starting point not considered that would be a better option)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jdwood 983, welcome to PF!:smile:

I haven't tackled the problem myself yet, but you might try solving it in the momentum basis instead and see if that leaves you with something less complicated...
 
The professor said he wants this done in coordinate space, so that's a no go :(

Thanks for the welcome!
 
jdwood983 said:
I have tried using a completing the square and making the substitution of

<br /> \frac{1}{2}m\omega_0^2\left(x^2-2cx\right)\rightarrow\frac{1}{2}m\omega_0^2\left(u^2-c^2\right)<br />

but not really sure where this leads me ...

This leads you to

-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}\psi(u)}{du^{2}}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}u^{2}\psi(u)=(E+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}c^{2}})\psi(u)

It is ye olde harmonicke oscillator equation with the origin shifted by c and the "zero of energy" shifted by -(1/2)mω2c2. A parabola is a parabola is a parabola.
 
kuruman said:
This leads you to

-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}\psi(u)}{du^{2}}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}u^{2}\psi(u)=(E+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}c^{2}})\psi(u)

It is ye olde harmonicke oscillator equation with the origin shifted by c and the "zero of energy" shifted by -(1/2)mω2c2. A parabola is a parabola is a parabola.

Wow, I was too busy looking at special differential functions that I didn't even see that one. Thanks for your help!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top