Einstein solid, Sterling approximation

nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Use Sterling's approximation to show that the multiplicity of an Einstein solid, for any large values of N and q is approximately
\Omega(N,q) = \frac{(\frac{q+N}{q})^q(\frac{q+N}{N})^N}{\sqrt{2\pi q(q+N)/N}}

Homework Equations


\Omega(N,q) = \frac{(N+q-1)!}{q!(N-1)!}
\ln(x!) \simeq x\ln(x) - x

The Attempt at a Solution


I see where the terms in the numerator come from, but I cannot see where the terms in the denominator come from. Specifically, the squareroot, and the factor of 2 pi*q. When I grind out the math, I get that the denominator should be (q+N)/N. Help anyone?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Solved it... Turns out I had to use the other Sterling's approximation

N! = N^Ne^{-N}\sqrt{2\pi N}
 
Sterling' s approximation is

n! \approx \sqrt{2\,\pi\,n}\left(\frac{n}{e}\right)^n

To get your formula fist get rid of 1 at (N+q-1)!,\,(N-1)!

I think that in the formula

\Omega(N,q) = \frac{(\frac{q+N}{q})^q(\frac{q+N}{N})^N}{\sqrt{2\pi q(q+N)/N}}

the denominator must be \sqrt{2\,\pi\,q\,N/(q+N)}
 
:smile: You solved it while I was typing!
 
Thanks... it's the thought that counts anyway!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top