Einstein's Nobel Prize for Photo-Electric Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter einsteinian77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nobel prize
AI Thread Summary
Einstein received the Nobel Prize for his work on the photo-electric effect rather than for relativity due to the Nobel committee's preference for experimental validation over theoretical concepts. The photo-electric effect had a direct experimental connection, making it more favorable for recognition. In contrast, theories like special and general relativity were seen as less experimentally grounded at the time. Additionally, the Nobel committee's political considerations may have influenced the timing of awards, as seen in the delayed recognition of other quantum theorists. Ultimately, the distinction highlights the committee's focus on fundamental physics that can be empirically validated.
einsteinian77
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Its a well known fact the Einstein didn't receive his nobel prize for Relativity but instead he got it for his work on the photo-electric effect. Why is this? Is it because Relativity was less creative than photo-electric effect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion it was due to the direct connection with experiment of the pohoto-electric effect. The Nobel committee then and now is suspicious of theory that doesn't tie to experiment. You will find that many quantum theorist's prizes (Pauli, Born) were delayed a long time until unmistakeable evidence for theose crazy quantum ideas turned up in the labs.
 
*** Einstein's Nobel prize:- SR/GR vs. QM ***

Politically Correct Answer:

SR/GR is about basic Mathematics (e.g. Speed = c iff Mass = 0)

and

QM is about Fundamental Physics (e.g. photo-electric effect)...


So, Einstein's Nobel prize is associated with QM, instead of SR/GR.


[?]


kx21
 
THe Nobel committee is not allowed to present prizes posthumously, otherwise Al would definitely have received a second prize. It is speculated that his unfavorable (and unfair) attachment to "the bomb" deferred his selection for a few crucial years (the Nobel comittee is still somewhat political). I don't think that there is any direct evidence of his being eschewed.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top