Why Do Sound Signals Appear Simultaneous in Einstein's Train Thought Experiment?

pegasso
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
why we do not observe any “lack of simultaneity” when we substitute sound signals for the light flashes in the “thought experiment” with a train moving past a platform (Einstein's lightning strike-train "thought experiment")?

this has troubled me for 5hours now. i don't know whether it is too advanced a question for me or whether i am blind to the answer.

can anyone help?

thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All observers measure the same value for the speed of light, but they measure the speed of sound to depend on their velocities relative to the air.
 
the addition of velocities theorem was part of the reason for my confusion. i couldn't understand why simultaneity occurs when the sound signals are used? surely the observer in the reference frame moving at around c wouldn't hear the sound signal emitted from the point behind he/she?
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top