Elastic 2D Collision with Lots of Unknowns

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a two-dimensional elastic collision problem involving two masses, m1 and m2, with m1 initially moving and m2 at rest. The key equations for momentum conservation in both x and y directions, as well as kinetic energy conservation, are provided. The challenge lies in the presence of four unknowns (initial velocity v0, final velocities v1 and v2, and recoil angle phi) with only three equations available. Participants suggest rearranging the equations and using the energy equation to eliminate variables, leading to a quadratic equation for v1. The consensus is that v2 and phi can be expressed in terms of v0, simplifying the calculations.
mindarson
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Mass m1, moving to the right, collides with mass m2, which is at rest before the collision. The masses are m1 = 0.1 kg and m2 = 0.2 kg. The scattering angle of m1 will be 30 degrees above the horizontal.

a) Calculate the recoil angle phi of m_2.

b) Calculate the recoil speed of m_2.

Homework Equations



m_1*v_0 = m_2*v_2*cosφ + m_1*v_1*cos30 (mom. cons. in x)

m_2*v_2*sinφ = m_1*v_1*sin30 (mom. cons. in y)

0.5*m_1*v_0^2 = 0.5*m_1*v_1^2 + 0.5*m_2*v2^2 (KE cons.)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'll spare you the messy algebra unless requested. My approach has been to try to eliminate variables, since I have FOUR unknowns (v_0, v_1, v_2, and phi) and only 3 equations. But nothing I've done so far has helped me. Can I really come up with formulas for v_2 and phi in terms of just m_1, m_2, and the 30 deg recoil angle of m_1?

I have also considered trying to use the c.m. frame, but I really don't see how that would help in this problem.

It seems to me the physics here is simple. It's the algebra that's messing me up! Maybe? Can anyone offer a friendly nudge in the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mindarson said:

Homework Equations



m_1*v_0 = m_2*v_2*cosφ + m_1*v_1*cos30 (mom. cons. in x)

m_2*v_2*sinφ = m_1*v_1*sin30 (mom. cons. in y)

0.5*m_1*v_0^2 = 0.5*m_1*v_1^2 + 0.5*m_2*v2^2 (KE cons.)

Correct if phi is the angle measured clockwise from the direction of vo.


mindarson said:
Can I really come up with formulas for v_2 and phi in terms of just m_1, m_2, and the 30 deg recoil angle of m_1?

No, you can calculate v2 and phi in terms of v0.


Arrange all equations so that the quantities labelled by "1" are on one side, and those labelled by "2" on the other side.

Take the square of both momentum equations, and add them: the unknown angle cancels.

Eliminate v2 using the energy equation. You get a quadratic equation for v1. ...

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top