Elastic and inelastic collision problems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding elastic and inelastic collisions, particularly the application of conservation of momentum and energy equations. A key point is that in elastic collisions, the difference in velocities before and after the collision is equal but reversed, which can be visualized from the center of mass perspective. The process involves initially calculating an inelastic collision to determine velocity changes, then applying those changes to find the final velocities in an elastic collision. The coefficient of restitution formula is also mentioned as a way to derive the relationships between velocities in these types of collisions. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of these principles in solving collision problems effectively.
Bernoulli19
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,
Reviewing material for a technical interview and I have stumbled into some problems that I sadly have issues with. Old review for me :D. Any help would be appreciated.

Capture.PNG


I can follow up through the conservation of energy equation. However at the in an elastic collision line, I do not know why those are being subtracted. That would not seem to follow the conservation of momentum since the masses are not the same.

assuming i can get that part, the Vo = v - V is just substituted into the simplified conservation of momentum equation? Is nothing done with the conservation of energy equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bernoulli19 said:
Hey everyone,
Reviewing material for a technical interview and I have stumbled into some problems that I sadly have issues with. Old review for me :D. Any help would be appreciated.

Capture.PNG


I can follow up through the conservation of energy equation. However at the in an elastic collision line, I do not know why those are being subtracted. That would not seem to follow the conservation of momentum since the masses are not the same.

assuming i can get that part, the Vo = v - V is just substituted into the simplified conservation of momentum equation? Is nothing done with the conservation of energy equation?

That velocity arrangement is actually true. It is saying that the difference in velocity before collision is the reverse of the difference in velocity after. If you visualise the collision from the point of view of the centre of mass - you would see both masses approach the C of M at a certain speed, then bounce off at the same speed [but opposite direction].

I will demonstrate:

The way I work these problems is as follows.

If you calculate as if for an inelastic collision [totally - the masses stick together] in the first instance, you can note how much the velocity of each body changes for that to happen.
When the collision is actually elastic, the velocities change by that much again.

eg if M = 10, m = 1 and the initial vel of M was 11 m/s

During collision, at the point when the masses are traveling at the same velocity, that common velocity will be 10m/s [conservation of momentum will get you that - I chose figures wisely to avoid decimals]

If the collision was inelastic, you have finished

If the collision is elastic we look at the changes.
VM reduced by 1 - from 11 to 10.
Vm increased by 10 - from 0 to 10

They will change by that much again!

So afterwards:
VM = 9 [reduced by another 1]
and
Vm = 20 [increased by another 10]

before collision, M was traveling 11 m/s faster than m
after collision, m is traveling 11 m/s faster than M

NOTE: The Centre of Mass of this system has been traveling at a constant 10 m/s.

Before, M was doing 11 m/s, so approaching the CofM at 1 m/s, afterwards it was moving away at 1 m/s [or traveling at 9 m/s relative to a stationary observer]
Before, m was approaching at 10 m/s [some would say the CofM was approaching it at 10 m/s], afterwards it was moving away from the CofM at 10 m/s - [or traveling at 20 m/s relative to a stationary observer]
 
Thank you for the quick reply. I am going on a quick trip in the morning but i read this a few times and will work on it at the airport and let you know wednesdayish. Thanks!
 
Another way to look at this is to see that those equations can be derived from the coefficient of restitution formula:
e = \frac{v^{'}_{2} - v^{'}_{1}}{v_{1} - v_{2}}
Where e = 1 in an elastic collision, and e = 0 in a perfectly inelastic collision. All other inelastic collisions range in between.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top