Elastic Collision: Finding Velocities After Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chica1975
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Elastic
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about an elastic collision problem, a 5.00g object moving at 20.0 cm/s collides with a stationary 10.0g object, prompting a request for help in finding their velocities post-collision. The participant has converted units to kg and m/s and attempted to calculate momentum using the formula p=mv, but has not achieved the correct answers. Key concepts highlighted include the conservation of momentum and energy, emphasizing that both equations are necessary to solve such problems. The need for detailed calculations was noted, suggesting that sharing these would help identify where the misunderstanding lies. Understanding the application of conservation principles in collisions is crucial for solving these types of physics problems.
Chica1975
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a 5.00g object moving to the right at 20.0cm/s makes an elastic head-on collision with a 10.0g object that is initially at rest. Find the velocity of each object after the collision.


Homework Equations



p=mv
m1v1 +m2v2/m=m1=m2

The Attempt at a Solution


I have attempted this question several times.

I have converted all units to kg and m/s before starting all calculations.
I found the momentum for each using p=mv but this was not the right answer.
then I tried the other equation I have given and tried to minus the initial velocity from answer - still its not correct.

I am not great at collisions and find these really difficult - esp the conservation of energy/momentum concepts. I don't know to translate the conceptual into the application using equations and the info given in the question.

Please someone help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Chica1975! :smile:
Chica1975 said:
I have converted all units to kg and m/s before starting all calculations.
I found the momentum for each using p=mv but this was not the right answer.
then I tried the other equation I have given and tried to minus the initial velocity from answer - still its not correct.

I am not great at collisions and find these really difficult - esp the conservation of energy/momentum concepts. I don't know to translate the conceptual into the application using equations and the info given in the question.

In collisions, momentum is always conserved.

In collisions, energy is never conserved unless the question says so … in this case it does, because it uses the word "elastic".

You always need two equations to solve a collision question … one is always conservation of momentum, the other is either conservation of energy or some other constraint like "perfeclty inelastic" or " coefficient of restitution = 0.5".

So here you'll need both of the conservation equations …

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong, and we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
711
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top