Elastic Collision why I am wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an elastic collision problem involving two pucks on an air-hockey table, focusing on the application of conservation of energy and momentum. The initial poster expresses confusion over a contradiction between their equations derived from conservation laws in different frames of reference. A response suggests using conservation of energy to determine the final momentum of puck B, while also emphasizing the need to account for momentum in the y-direction. The responder provides a structured approach to derive the final speed and angles of the pucks using three equations, highlighting the importance of trigonometric relationships. The conversation underscores the complexities of applying conservation laws in different frames and the need for careful equation management.
cks
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
From the pictures(my solutions) I submitted, I know that I can straightly find the magnitude of the velocity of the puck B by using conservation of energy in the lab frame.

However, my gut feelings tell me that answering the question using conservation of energy in the moving frame (puck A) will do.

But I find something awkward when I write down all the equations. Equation (3) which is the conservation of energy in the moving frame give equation that contradicts equation (2) (which is the conservation of momentum in the y-direction) .

Why is this so? I have checked everything and couldn't see anything that are against the law of physics.

Thank you.


An elastic collision of two pucks on a frictionless air-hockey table. Puck A has mass mA=0.500 kg and puck B has mass mB=0.300 kg. Puck A has an initial velocity of 4.00 m/2 in the positive x-direction and a final velocity of 2.00 m/2 in an unknown direction. Puck B is initially at rest. Find the final speed of VB2 of puck B and the angles Alpha and Beta in the figure.


100_1494.jpg


100_1496.jpg

.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll be honest, I didn't read your pages of equations which require scrolling to see.

To find B's final momentum, it's simple conservation of energy. You know the total momentum in the y-direction is zero. So your equations should be something like:

m is mass of A
M is mass of B
v is velocity of A
V is velocity of B

1/2mvinitial2 = 1/2(mv2 + MV2

mvinitial = mvcos(alpha) + MVcos(beta)

MVsin(beta) = mvsin(alpha)

Now, your unknowns are alpha, beta, and V, and you have three equations. So you should be able to solve for them.. first get V from conservation of energy, then work on the angles (it's possibly easier if you use some trigonometric relationships first, such as sin2x + cos2x = 1). I would recommend squaring both sides of equation 3, then solving for cos of alpha and beta
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top