Elastic Collision Homework: 3kg Mass, 4m/s Velocity, 2kg Resting Mass

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision problem involving a 3 kg mass moving at 4 m/s colliding with a 2 kg mass at rest, the conservation of momentum and energy equations are used to find final velocities. The discussion highlights a confusion regarding the correct application of the relative velocity equation, v_1 - v_2 = -(u_1 - u_2), leading to different expressions for u_1. Clarification reveals that the initial velocities should be correctly identified, with u representing final velocities, resulting in consistent equations. Ultimately, both methods yield valid simultaneous equations to solve for the final velocities of the masses.
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


A body of mass 3 kg slides on a friction less surface with velocity 4 m/s and collides elastically with a resting mass of 2 kg. calculate the final velocities.

Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum: m_1v_1+m_2v_2=m_1u_1+m_2u_2
Conservation of energy: \frac{1}{2}m_1v_1^2+\frac{1}{2}m_2v_2^2=\frac{1}{2}m_1u_1^2+\frac{1}{2}m_2u_2^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved those two equations and got a correct answer. but my question is as follows:
If we solve, as a general case, the two above equations we get a third equation:
v_1-v_2=-(u_1-u_2)
Which states that the relative velocities before and after the collision remain the same.
When i solved this third equation together with the first equation, that of the conservation of momentum i got, of course, a wrong answer.
Can you explain? both ways seem correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It might help to show your work. I don't see why the latter approach should give you a wrong answer.
 
My work

When i use the first method, the long way by solving fully the 2 equations, right from the start there is a difference: from the Conservation of momentum:
3\cdot 4=3u_1+2u_2 \Rightarrow u_1=4-\frac{2}{3}u_2
The second equation in both methods is the conservation of energy which remains the same.
In the second method, from the equation:
v_1-v_2=-(u_1-u_2) \Rightarrow 3=-(u_1-u_2) \Rightarrow u_1=u_2-3
The two u1 differ.
 
Karol said:
v_1-v_2=-(u_1-u_2) \Rightarrow 3=-(u_1-u_2) \Rightarrow u_1=u_2-3
The two u1 differ.
Based on sign convention, if positive is towards right, then it should be
u_{1} - u_{2} = 4
and that gives same answer as the previous approach since u_{2} is zero.
You might have mixed up some numbers in your attempt (eg. the 3 you have here instead of 4).
 
Fightfish said:
Based on sign convention, if positive is towards right, then it should be
u_{1} - u_{2} = 4
Thanks, i wouldn't have found it, but i think you have a mistake, if i take it as you wrote:
u_1=u_2+4
the answer would be wrong. and why should i change signs? i shouldn't take into consideration the positive direction since the equation:
v_1-v_2=-(u_1-u_2)
Is general, it doesn't take in consideration directions, no?
So, if i use:
u_1=u_2-4
then it comes out right
 
I think we might have been using different letters for initial and final. I assumed that u referred to the initial velocity. If so, then u1 = 4 is the correct answer since u2 = 0 and the direction of the initial block is taken to be positive.
 
Yup, seems that you mean final velocities by u. Then the two equations that you mentioned earlier:
u_1=4-\frac{2}{3}u_2
u_1=u_2-4
are correct.

There is no disagreement between them; they form a pair of simultaneous equations that allow you to determine both u_{1} and u_{2}
 
Back
Top