Elastic collisions between proton and helium nucleus

pentazoid
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




In an elastic collision between a proton and a helium nucleus at rest, the proton was scattered through an angle of 45 degrees. What proportion of its initial energy did it lose? what was the recoil angle of the helium nucleus?

Homework Equations



tan\theta1=(sin\Psi))/((cos(\Psi)+\gamma)

\theta2=1/2(pi-\Psi)

tan\theta=((\gamma)+1)/(\gamma-1)*cot(.5*\gamma)

E2/E0=4\gamma(sin(1/2*\gamma)^2/(\gamma+1)^2

phi is the scaterttering angle in the ZM frame and gamma=m2/m1, the mass ratio of the two particles. \theta2 is the recoil angle and \theta1 is the scatter angle.

The Attempt at a Solution



mhelium=4*mproton , therefore gamma=1/4
\theta1=45 degrees

tan(45 degrees)=sin(phi)/(cos(phi)+.25)
1=sin(phi)/(cos(phi)+.25)==> cos(phi)+.25=sin (phi)

not sure how I can determine phi with sin(phi)-cos*(phi)=.25 ; I know I need phi to determine the recoil angle.

not sure how to determined how much initial energy was lost but I know it probably will have to apply this elastic formulae:

E2/E0=4\gamma(sin(1/2*\gamma)^2/(\gamma+1)^2

Does E0 represent the initial energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pentazoid said:
not sure how I can determine phi with sin(phi)-cos*(phi)=.25

Hi pentazoid! :smile:

(have a phi: φ :wink:)

Hint: sin(φ - 45º) = sinφcos45º - cosφsin45º :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top