Elastic Collisions & Center of Mass

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision between two bumper cars, the velocity of the center of mass is calculated to be 0.234 m/s. The initial velocity of car 1 in the center-of-mass frame is determined to be 3.77 m/s, while its final velocity in that frame is expected to be -3.77 m/s due to the conservation of momentum. The final velocities of both cars in the original reference frame require using the formula V1f=V1i*(m1-m2)/(m1+m2), which has caused confusion for some users. Additionally, the discussion highlights that inelastic collisions result in a loss of kinetic energy, explaining why the change in kinetic energy is greater in elastic collisions. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the principles of momentum and energy conservation in different types of collisions.
kiki_havoc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. A bumper car with mass m1 = 105 kg is moving to the right with a velocity of v1 = 4 m/s. A second bumper car with mass m2 = 98 kg is moving to the left with a velocity of v2 = -3.8 m/s. The two cars have an elastic collision. Assume the surface is frictionless.
2.Vcm= (m1v1+m2v2)/m1+m2
V1 in CM frame=V1i-Vcm


1. What is the velocity of the center of mass of the system? 0.234 m/s, solved using velocity of center of mass eqn Vcm.

2. What is the initial velocity of car 1 in the center-of-mass reference frame? 3.77 m/s, solved using V1 in CM frame=V1i-Vcm.

3. What is the final velocity of car 1 in the center-of-mass reference frame? I guessed this one, since it is 'perfectly' elastic, the velocity in the reference frame would be the same magnitude, opposite direction (I think...) so = -3.77m/s

4. What is the final velocity of car 1 in the ground (original) reference frame?
this one I'm having issues with: I've been following an example for this type of question in my textbook, and it gives the eqn V1f=V1i*(m1-m2/m1+m2). I have tried this several times and am not getting the answer, and so am very confused.

5. What is the final velocity of car 2 in the ground (original) reference frame? I assume this is a similar question to #4.

6. In a new (inelastic) collision, the same two bumper cars with the same initial velocities now latch together as they collide.
What is the final speed of the two bumper cars after the collision? haven't attempted yet.

7. why would the |ΔKE elastic| > |ΔKE inelastic| ? I guessed this one and got it right, but don't understand why.Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks for reading!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kiki_havoc said:
1. A bumper car with mass m1 = 105 kg is moving to the right with a velocity of v1 = 4 m/s. A second bumper car with mass m2 = 98 kg is moving to the left with a velocity of v2 = -3.8 m/s. The two cars have an elastic collision. Assume the surface is frictionless.



2.Vcm= (m1v1+m2v2)/m1+m2
V1 in CM frame=V1i-Vcm





1. What is the velocity of the center of mass of the system? 0.234 m/s, solved using velocity of center of mass eqn Vcm.

2. What is the initial velocity of car 1 in the center-of-mass reference frame? 3.77 m/s, solved using V1 in CM frame=V1i-Vcm.

3. What is the final velocity of car 1 in the center-of-mass reference frame? I guessed this one, since it is 'perfectly' elastic, the velocity in the reference frame would be the same magnitude, opposite direction (I think...) so = -3.77m/s

4. What is the final velocity of car 1 in the ground (original) reference frame?
this one I'm having issues with: I've been following an example for this type of question in my textbook, and it gives the eqn V1f=V1i*(m1-m2/m1+m2). I have tried this several times and am not getting the answer, and so am very confused.

5. What is the final velocity of car 2 in the ground (original) reference frame? I assume this is a similar question to #4.

6. In a new (inelastic) collision, the same two bumper cars with the same initial velocities now latch together as they collide.
What is the final speed of the two bumper cars after the collision? haven't attempted yet.

7. why would the |ΔKE elastic| > |ΔKE inelastic| ? I guessed this one and got it right, but don't understand why.


Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks for reading!


The key here is that the c of m has the same velocity throughout - before, during and after the collision.
 
kiki_havoc said:
4...I've been following an example... V1f=V1i*(m1-m2/m1+m2). I have tried this several times and am not getting the answer
that formula applies when m2 is at rest: v'1→ = 4 x 0.034482758, you should add v'2
or use the http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
logics said:
that formula applies when m2 is at rest: v'1→ = 4 x 0.034482758, you should add v'2
or use the http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision"

I liked the look of parts 1,2&3. Your reasoning was correct for part 3.

4, involves the reverse of the process you used for part 2.

5 is indeed the same working as 4. having lead you through the three steps [2,3,4] they have just asked for the final answer - which you do by using the equivalent three steps.

6. Think about my first comment, and your answer to part 1.

7. In an elastic collision the energy is conserved. In an inelastic collision it is not - it is different. You can never get more energy after, than you had before - there is only one alternative left.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you! Your replies really helped clarify the concept for me.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top