Elastic Collisions in one dimension

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around a one-dimensional elastic collision involving two particles on a frictionless surface. Particle 1, with a mass of 0.30 kg, collides with stationary Particle 2, which has a mass of 0.40 kg. The problem involves determining the position on the x-axis where Particle 2 collides with Particle 1 after bouncing off a wall.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of momentum alongside kinetic energy conservation to analyze the collision. There is an exploration of how to use the final velocities obtained from these conservation laws to find the collision point. Some participants suggest calculating the distance traveled by each particle over time to determine when they meet.

Discussion Status

The conversation has progressed with participants providing insights into the necessary equations and considerations for solving the problem. There is an acknowledgment of the need to account for the wall's effect on Particle 2's motion. One participant has indicated a misunderstanding regarding unit conversion, which has been clarified.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is also a mention of the assumption that the wall does not significantly affect the momentum of the system.

patelkey
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Particle 1 of mass m1 = 0.30 kg slides rightward along an x-axis on a frictionless floor with a speed of 2.0 m/s. When it reaches x = 0, it undergoes a one-dimensional elastic collision with stationary particle 2 of mass m2 = 0.40 kg. When particle 2 then reaches a wall at xw = 70 cm, it bounces from it with no loss of speed. At what position on the x-axis does particle 2 then collide with particle 1?

Homework Equations




1/2m1v1i^2 = 1/2m1v1f^2 + 1/2m2v2f^2
3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b
I found all the values in the equation however, I don't know how to apply that to figure out the position where they will collide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
that's good, but you need another conserved quantity to solve the equation. Have you tried using conservation of momentum?

m_1 v_{1i} = m_1 v_{1f} + m_2 v_{2f}
 
After using the equation you gave me I got v2f=3m/s and v1f=-2m/s
but what do I do with these two quantities to figure out the point of collision?
 
okay, so one is moving left at 2 m/s (v_{1f} = -2 \frac{m}{s}) and one is moving right at 3 m/s (v_{2f} = 3 \frac{m}{s}.

Another important fact is the particle loses no speed when it hits the wall, so you may assume it just changes direction with the same speed.
(side note: technically, to conserve momentum, you have to assume the wall it hits moves backwards as well, but you can say that the mass of the wall is so huge it barely moves, so m_1 v_{1i}= m_1 v_{1f} + m_{wall} v_{wall} \rightarrow \frac{m_1}{m_{wall}} (v_{1i} - v_{1f}) = v_{wall}, but m_{wall} >> m_1 so v_{wall} is approx 0 )

You can start by calculating how far the one moving left at 2 m/s will get from the point of collision (say x_0 = 0) when the one moving right hits the wall, and then find how long it will take for them to meet with the simple equations:

x_1 (t) = v_{1f} t + x_1
<br /> x_2 (t) = v_{2f} t + x_2<br />

where x_1, x_2 are the initial positions of the masses respectively from the point of collision at the time the second particle strikes the wall,

and find when x_1(t) = x_2 (t), solve for that time and plug it in one of the equations to get the distance.

however, there is a slightly more clever way, using the same methods, where you can solve for it in one less step. In what way can you move the particle and slightly change the situation such that the time the particle takes to get to the wall and back in the original situation is the same but it involves no wall?
 
I got it
It turned out I was entering -0.28 cm but I forgot to convert it so it was actually -28 cm thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K