Elastic vs. Completely Elastic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nx01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elastic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the classification of a collision involving a 2.4kg ball that hits the floor at 2.5m/s and rebounds at 1.5m/s. The consensus is that the collision is inelastic, as it does not conserve kinetic energy. The distinction between "elastic" and "completely elastic" collisions is clarified; while the former can occur in macroscopic scenarios, the latter implies total kinetic energy conservation, which is not the case here. Thus, the collision is categorized as inelastic rather than completely elastic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of collision types: elastic and inelastic
  • Basic principles of momentum and kinetic energy conservation
  • Familiarity with macroscopic physics concepts
  • Knowledge of the definitions of completely elastic and elastic collisions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of momentum conservation in collisions
  • Study the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions in detail
  • Examine real-world examples of elastic collisions
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of collisions in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding collision dynamics and energy conservation principles.

nx01
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.4kg ball falling vertically hits the floor with a speed of 2.5m/s and rebounds with a speed of 1.5m/s. The impact or "collision" described in this problem is:

a. completely elastic
b. completely inelastic
c. elastic
d. inelastic

2. The attempt at a solution

As I understand it, the collision in this problem is "inelastic". However, the answer choices make a distinction between "completely elastic" and "elastic" collisions. Since there are no elastic collisions on the macroscopic scale, this cannot be a "completely elastic" collision. Yet, since some macroscopic collisions are approximated as elastic collisions, this might count as an "elastic" collision.

Is the distinction between elastic and completely elastic collisions a legitimate one, or is it there just to throw me off? How would you answer this question?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's there just to throw you off. A collision is either elastic or not. On the other hand, an inelastic collision isn't necessarily completely inelastic, so it makes sense to make a distinction.
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K