Electric and magnetic fields experiment

AI Thread Summary
A bar magnet emits a magnetic field that typically extends about 3 inches, with its strength decreasing as 1/r^3. In contrast, electromagnetic radiation, which combines electric and magnetic fields, can travel much farther because it falls off as 1/r. This difference arises because electromagnetic radiation is produced by accelerating charges, while static fields are generated by static charges or steady currents. The discussion highlights that monopole fields decrease as 1/r^2, while dipole fields decrease as 1/r^3, explaining the varying distances of field strength. Understanding these principles clarifies why electromagnetic radiation carries energy and extends further than static fields.
JKaufinger
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have a simple question here that I seem not to be able to figure out.

If you have a regular bar magnet, it emits a magnetic field around it.
So, if you create an experiment and found out how far that field reached, you would see that the field doesn't go very far. Maybe like 3 inches (~ 7cm). (This is for a regular, bought at the grocery store bar magnet).

I would also bet that if you found a way to make a magnet that instead emitted an electric field, it would have the same result: not very far.

So, if electromagnetic radiation is just these two fields put together, then why do they go much farther than electric and magnetic fields individually? Also, why do they carry energy, when individual electric and magnetic fields alone are just force?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The static magnetic field of a magnet falls off like 1/r^3.
Radiation fields of oscillating charges or magnets fall off like 1/r, and thus extend to much larger distances.
 
Electromagnetic radiation and static E-field and B-field are completely different.
Electromagnetic radiation is caused by accelerating charge while static fields are caused by static charge and steady current.
 
clem said:
The static magnetic field of a magnet falls off like 1/r^3.
Radiation fields of oscillating charges or magnets fall off like 1/r, and thus extend to much larger distances.
Eh, is there any reason why it's decreases inversely proportionate to r^3 rather than the more familiar r^2?
 
Defennder said:
Eh, is there any reason why it's decreases inversely proportionate to r^3 rather than the more familiar r^2?

I'm not sure that familiarity is a terribly good guideline.

A monopole field falls as 1/r2. A dipole field as 1/r3. Higher moments fall faster still.

You can prove this by calculating the field from a dipole as two oppositely charged monopoles a distance apart.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...

Similar threads

Back
Top