Electric Charge Image Theory - Half-Infinite Planes

AI Thread Summary
A point charge Q is positioned between two half-infinite grounded conducting plates forming an angle theta. The discussion revolves around determining the magnitudes and locations of the image charges, which involves using geometric construction and superposition principles. It is noted that the image charge method leads to an infinite series of images, although in specific cases, the number of images can be finite based on the angle between the plates. The total induced charge on the conducting plates is confirmed to be -Q. The complexity of the problem increases with the projection across the imaginary portions of the planes.
aphid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge Q lies along the axis of symmetry between two half-infinite grounded conducting plates which form an angle theta (less than or equal to 90 degrees).
a. What are the magnitudes and locations of the image charges?
b. What is the total charge on the conducting plates?
c. Where does the charge come from?


Homework Equations


An application of Laplace's Equation I believe . . .


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm at somewhat of a loss here. The image of a point charge situated above a single infinite plane is simply its negative mirror image, resulting in an equivalent voltage field above the plane. My intuition tells me that I can somehow use superposition of the infinite plane case, but it would be a shot in the dark. I'm also fairly certain that a total charge -Q accumulates on the conductor, but I don't know how to explain this.

Any insight into this problem would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with finding the image locations by geometric construction. The first image is just the usual one you are familiar with (times two). But there's an image of each image in its opposite sheet. And so on. You'll have an infinite series.
 
Not sure if I am doing this correctly (see attached image). Am I supposed to extend each plane, effectively creating two intersecting infinite planes? It gets pretty messy once I start projecting across the 'imaginary' portions of the planes.

http://photoanon.com/viewer.php?file=zasljrfnro9t0u4u1tm6.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 000689.jpg
    000689.jpg
    30.2 KB · Views: 489
Yes, you've done this correctly (more or less--some of your distances don't match), and wow it gets messy. I tried it myself and found for the angles I used that the number of images was finite, so I looked it up. If the angle between planes is pi/n where n is an integer, there are (2n-1) images. In general, however, the number is infinite as I wrote above.

I agree that the total induced charge should be -Q.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top