Electric charge inside a cubical volume

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total electric charge within a cubical volume using Gauss's Law. The electric field intensity is given as E = 100x (V/m), and the user is confused about the units in their calculations. They correctly apply Gauss's Law and the Divergence Theorem but misinterpret the units of the divergence of the electric field. Clarification is provided that the divergence is in V/m², which, when multiplied by the volume, results in the correct unit of charge in coulombs. The user is reassured that their calculations are fundamentally correct, and the confusion stems from unit interpretation.
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Would someone be so kind to check if I am doing this properly. I'm confused on the units, as it doesn't seem to be coming out properly.

Q) Assuming that the electric field intensity is \vec E = \hat x 100 x \,\,(V/m), find the total electric charge contained inside a cubical volume 100 \,\, (mm) on a side centered symmetrically at the orgin.

My Work)
Recall:

\oint \vec E \cdot d\vec s = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0} (Gauss's Law)
\int_V \nabla \cdot \vec A \, dv = \oint_S \vec A \cdot d\vec s (Divergence Thm)

Thus,
\oint_S \vec E \cdot d\vec s = \int_V \nabla \cdot \vec E \, dv = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0}

\nabla \cdot \vec E = 100 \,\, (V/m)
100 (V/m) \int_V \, dv = 100\, (V/m)(100\times 10^{-3})^3(m^3) = \frac{1}{10} \,\, (V/m^2)

\frac{1}{10} \,\, (V/m^2) = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0}

Thus,
Q = \frac{\epsilon_0}{10} \,\, (v/m^2) = 8.854\times 10^{-12} \frac{coul}{m^3}

I thought the units for Q should be in coul? Why am I getting coul per unit volume? Am I not doing this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, it looks like a units problem, the numbers look fine.

\nabla \cdot \vec E is measured in V/m2, not V/m. Then you multiply by m3, and get Vm. The units of {\epsilon_0} are C/Vm, so Vm cancels and you get C.
 
Mighty appreciated my man :smile:

thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top