Electric Field and Infinite Plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving an electric field created by a uniformly charged infinite plane. The user derived the electric field formula and calculated the force on a point charge, but is confused about discrepancies in their final angle calculation. They initially used grams for mass instead of kilograms, which is highlighted as a potential source of error. Other participants suggest that the provided length of the string might be a distraction and emphasize the importance of verifying numerical values. The user remains uncertain about the correct answer, indicating issues with the online homework service they are using.
verd
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've worked out a problem and don't understand why it's wrong... I think I might be going about this incorrectly.

Here it is:

http://www.synthdriven.com/images/deletable/01.jpg

I started this by attempting to solve for E. In the beginning of the problem, I'm told that this is an infinite plate, "a uniformly charged vertical sheet of infinite extent", and have determined the following formula:

\vec{E}=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{o}}
(This is what was derived in class for an infinite surface, I can go over that if anyone would like... sigma=Q/A)

I'm taking the "areal charge density" to be sigma.\vec{E}=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{o}}=\frac{0.12\times10^{-6}}{2(8.85\times10^{-12})}=6779.66N/C

Using the following formula, I determined the force, (where q is my given point charge):

F=E\timesq=(6779.66)(0.11\times10^{-6})=0.000746N

http://www.synthdriven.com/images/deletable/02.jpg

According to my little force diagram, this F is equivalent to my x-component of the force labelled F. And the y-component of this force is zero...

The next force is the weight, mg. I wasn't sure whether or not to do this in grams or kilograms, so I kept it at grams (my professor converted from kg to g in a previous example in class... even though some problems are typically answered in kg)

W=mg=(1g)(9.8m/s^2)=9.8N

This force will be only in the -y direction, obviously.

And the tension, T is as follows:

T_{x}=T\sin{\theta}
T_{y}=T\cos{\theta}

\sum{F_{NETx}}=F_{x}+W_{x}-T_{x}=0.00076N+0N-T\sin{\theta}=0
T\sin{\theta}=0.00076N
T=\frac{0.00076N}{\sin{\theta}}

\sum{F_{NETy}}=F_{y}-W_{y}+T_{y}=0-9.8N+T\cos{\theta}=0
T\cos{\theta}=9.8N
T=\frac{9.8N}{\cos{\theta}}

\frac{0.00076N}{\sin{\theta}}=\frac{9.8N}{\cos{\theta}}
\frac{\sin{\theta}}{\cos{\theta}}=\frac{0.00076}{9.8}
\tan{\theta}=\frac{0.00076}{9.8}
\arctan{\frac{0.00076}{9.8}}=\theta
=0.004443 degreesWhat am I doing wrong? This seemed like the right way to go about it...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your units have to be consistent. Since you are using S.I., the unit of mass is Kg, and therefore the mass of the object is 10-3Kg.

Remember this, the S.I units are also known as the MKS system (Metre, Kilogram, Second). The cgs stands for (Centimetre, Gram, Second).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mks
 
Thanks.

That'd make my answer 4.3447 degrees... And yet my answer is still incorrect... Any ideas?
 
I cannot spot anything wrong in your calculation. I wonder why the length of the string has been provided (probably just to make you go off-track).
 
Yeah... That's what I was thinking. But who knows. I could actually have to use it somehow.

Seems like a way to make you waste your time realizing that you don't have enough information to find the angle trigometrically w/out physics.
 
Yes, I got the same answer too. What's the answer in your textbook ?
 
It's an online homework service. I have a couple of chances at an answer... So I don't know what the answer is.
 
Well, was any option close to the answer at least ?
 
Nope. I have no idea what it is. This method seems correct.
 
  • #10
May be (some of) the numbers you have are wrong. For example, that 0.00076 should be 0.000745/6. Just make sure that the numbers are correct to a few decimal places and submit an answer. Either that, or the online service has totally gone berserk. ;)
 
Back
Top