Electric Field Direction At The Center Of a Dipole?

rithusoumyaj
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Ok we know for a Dipole the direction of Electric Field for points on the the dipole axis is in the direction of Dipole Moment(from -ve to +ve charge) rite? Now we also know that fields emanate from +ve charge and extend towards -ve charge. So what will be the direction of Electric Field at the center of Dipole? In the direction of Dipole Moment(ie. from -ve to +ve) or from +ve charge to -ve charge(electric fields originate from the +ve charge and extends towards -ve charge rite?):confused:
Please clear my misconception?


- A Friend In Need!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Opposite of the dipole moment. Your first sentence is valid for magnetic dipoles, and this is the fundamental difference between the two.
 
Dickfore said:
Opposite of the dipole moment. Your first sentence is valid for magnetic dipoles, and this is the fundamental difference between the two.
Fundamental difference between two??
Magnetic dipole? What other kinds of dipoles are there?
So you mean for a magnetic dipole the direction of electric field at the center is in the direction of dipole moment?
Please be clear.
 
For a magnetic dipole, the direction of the magnetic field is the same as the direction of the magnetic dipole moment at the center of the dipole.

For electric dipoles, the direction of the electric field, being always from the positive to the negative charge, is directed oppositely from the direction of the electric dipole moment at its center, being conventionally chosen to be from the negative to the positive charge.
 
Dickfore said:
For a magnetic dipole, the direction of the magnetic field is the same as the direction of the magnetic dipole moment at the center of the dipole.

For electric dipoles, the direction of the electric field, being always from the positive to the negative charge, is directed oppositely from the direction of the electric dipole moment at its center, being conventionally chosen to be from the negative to the positive charge.
Got it :)
Thanks
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top