Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tesla In Person
  • Start date Start date
Tesla In Person
Messages
34
Reaction score
13
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point

View attachment 365746
Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A.
I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are infinite.
View attachment 365748
So applying gauss law : Q_enc is the volume of the cube of side a and face area A. That gives Q_enc= p*A*a and left hand side of gauss's law gives 2*A*E. I excluded the areas facing y and x directions since the field is pointing in the z direction so only the 2 faces facing in that direction are cut be the field lines. I get 2AE = p*A*a / epsilon and simplifying this gives E = p*a / 2*epsilon. I'm not sure if this is correct. If it's incorrect, I want to know where I made mistakes. I'm doing this for the first time and I'm struggling with these question especially when I have to find the right gaussian surface for the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your attachments did not seem to work. Can you try again? What file type are they?
 

berkeman said:
Your attachments did not seem to work. Can you try again? What file type are they?
image.webp

gaussian cube.webp


I don't know why they are not opening , Hope its fixed now. Its png files.
 
Tesla In Person said:
. . . and left hand side of gauss's law gives 2*A*E.
There are three regions of space:
  1. Inside the distribution ##~-\frac{a}{2} \leq z \leq\frac{a}{2}##
  2. To the left of the distribution: ##~z\leq-\frac{a}{2}##
  3. To the right of the distribution: ##~z\geq\frac{a}{2}##.
You need to find the electric field in each region. This means writing the electric field vector ##\mathbf E(z)## as a function of ##z##.
Hint: Is there a value of ##z## at which the electric field is zero?
 
kuruman said:
There are three regions of space:
  1. Inside the distribution ##~-\frac{a}{2} \leq z \leq\frac{a}{2}##
  2. To the left of the distribution: ##~z\leq-\frac{a}{2}##
  3. To the right of the distribution: ##~z\geq\frac{a}{2}##.
You need to find the electric field in each region. This means writing the electric field vector ##\mathbf E(z)## as a function of ##z##.
Hint: Is there a value of ##z## at which the electric field is zero?
Is it zero at the origin , z=0? But why would it be 0 at the origin , is it just a convention or is the strength of the electric field really 0 there ? The LaTeX doesn't appear in the message so I don't understand the points 1. 2. and 3.
 
Tesla In Person said:
Is it zero at the origin , z=0? But why would it be 0 at the origin , is it just a convention or is the strength of the electric field really 0 there ? The LaTeX doesn't appear in the message so I don't understand the points 1. 2. and 3.
For some reason the LaTeX works in "Preview" mode only. Here it is

Screen Shot 2025-09-22 at 4.41.39 PM.webp

Answer the following four questions and you will see why the electric field is zero at z = 0.
  1. In what direction does the electric field point in region 2, to the left of the distribution?
  2. In what direction does the electric field point in region 3, to the right of the distribution?
  3. In what direction does the electric field point inside the slab, to the left of the origin?
  4. In what direction does the electric field point inside the slab, to the right of the origin?
 
  • Informative
Likes Tesla In Person
kuruman said:
For some reason the LaTeX works in "Preview" mode only. Her

My experience has been that using preview mode destroys LaTeX rendering. It's a known issue.
 
Herman Trivilino said:
My experience has been that using preview mode destroys LaTeX rendering. It's a known issue.
It appears to be more complicated than that. I had a PM exchange with Greg and he observed that it might be the inclusion of LaTeX in an ordered list that messes up the rendering. An additional complication is that this appears to happen with posts on regular threads but not PM messages where LaTeX renders correctly. I haven't heard from Greg lately, but I'm sure he's on it.

Below is a screenshot of the preview of a test post. Everything looks good.

Screen Shot 2025-09-24 at 1.20.48 PM.webp

Here is a screenshot of the posted reply (since deleted). The "No ordering" LaTeX has been rendered correctly but not the rest. If I put this in a PM, all of it will be rendered.

Screen Shot 2025-09-24 at 1.21.43 PM.webp
 
Last edited:
Oh I see, they are pointing in opposite directions in all these regions so the electric field ends up cancelling out.
 
  • #10
Tesla In Person said:
Oh I see, they are pointing in opposite directions in all these regions so the electric field ends up cancelling out.
Cancelling out where?
Do you see what you need to do to find the electric field, magnitude and direction, for all values of ##z##?
 
Back
Top