Electric Field due to Solid Non-Conducting Cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field intensity, E, outside a solid non-conducting cylinder with a charge density that increases with radius. The relevant equation for electric field intensity is E = k{dq}/{r}^{2}, and the solution involves applying Gauss's Law. Participants highlight the importance of understanding that the electric field outside the cylinder depends on the distance from the cylinder, not just the radius. Resources are shared to assist in solving the problem, and one participant confirms they arrived at the correct answer with guidance. The conversation emphasizes the application of theoretical principles to practical problems in electrostatics.
thiefjack
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Positive charge is distributed throughout a solid non-conducting cylinder of radius 'b ' and infinite length. The charge density increases with radius according to ρ = {ρ}_{o}({r}{^2}/{b}{^2}), where {ρ}_{o} is a constant (evidently equal to the charge density at the surface of the cylinder).

Find the electric field intensity, E, as a function of radius, outside the cylinder.

Homework Equations



E = k{dq}/{r}^{2}

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure where to get started, actually. If we try to find the electric field intensity at a position outside the cylinder wouldn't it be dependent on how far out we're finding the electric field and not dependent on the radius?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a straight forward application of Gauss's Law. See example 1.4 which is similar to your problem.

http://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter1/ch1_3.htm

See also,

http://www.chem.ox.ac.uk/teaching/Physics%20for%20CHemists/Electricity/Gauss.html

http://research.physics.illinois.edu/PER/unit4.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I got the right answer with your help, Spinnor.

Thanks for the pointing me in the right direction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top