Electric field from a charged rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the electric field expression at a point along the perpendicular bisector of a charged rod with known total charge and length. The user initially presents an integral that they believe is complex and seeks assistance. A participant confirms that the integral is indeed challenging but suggests a different approach by repositioning the origin to the middle of the rod and using an angle variable instead of x. This alternative method is proposed to simplify the integral, although it is acknowledged that the original formula is correct but still complicated. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in mathematical derivations related to electric fields.
MaximumTaco
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Ok, I'm inexperienced with the latex code, so excuse me.

I'm trying to derive the expression for the electric field at a point, along the perpendicular bisector of a charged rod, of known total charge, length L, a perpendicular distance y from the rod.

The horizontal components cancel,
<br /> \frac{qy}{4\pi \varepsilon_0 L} \int_0^L \frac{dx}{((\frac{L}{2}-x)^2 +y^2)^{3/2}}<br />
I don't think this is right, because that seems a nasty integral. Any ideas?

Apologies if you think this is the wrong section. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I finally got the tex perfect. Can somebody please help me as soon as possible? Thanks alot.
 
The integral's not too bad.. Hint:
\int (1+x^2)^{-3/2}dx=x/\sqrt{1+x^2}
 
MaximumTaco said:
Ok, I'm inexperienced with the latex code, so excuse me.

I'm trying to derive the expression for the electric field at a point, along the perpendicular bisector of a charged rod, of known total charge, length L, a perpendicular distance y from the rod.

The horizontal components cancel,
<br /> \frac{qy}{4\pi \varepsilon_0 L} \int_0^L \frac{dx}{((\frac{L}{2}-x)^2 +y^2)^{3/2}} <br />
I don't think this is right, because that seems a nasty integral. Any ideas?

You are right, this is not right, and the integral is nasty.
You get a much nicer integral if you place your origin at the middle of the rod, and use the angle \varphi instead of x. See pic.

r=\frac{y}{\cos(\varphi )} \mbox{ , } x = y \tan(\varphi )...

ehild
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
You are right, this is not right, and the integral is nasty.

ehild

Sorry, the formula was right... But it is still nasty.

ehild
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top