Electric Field in 3 Parallel Plates

AI Thread Summary
The electric field at point A between three parallel plates is calculated using the equation E = σ/2ε. By considering the contributions from the plates, the net charge at point A is derived as 3σ, leading to the result of E = 3σ/2ε. An alternative method using a Gaussian box confirms this calculation, yielding the same result of E = (3/2)σ/ε. Both approaches validate the correctness of the solution. The discussion emphasizes the consistency of the electric field calculation in this configuration.
Broem
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the electric field at point A in the unit of σ/ε0?


Homework Equations


E=σ/2ε


The Attempt at a Solution


I just want to make sure my thinking behind this is correct.
From the center we have +5σ. To find the A what I did is subtract the other two -σ from the 5: this gives me 5-1-1 = 3.
From here I just plug in: 3σ/2ε which in the units = 1.5 σ/ε

Is this the correct approach?
 

Attachments

  • three-plates-exam.jpg
    three-plates-exam.jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 1,249
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep.
 
Alternative sol'n: if you put a Gaussian box of area = 1m^2 and running from A to D, the inside net free charge is 3σ C and the total flux area is 2 m^2 (no flux out the other 4 sides if the plates are infinite in dimension).

That would make εE*2m^2 = 3σ so E = (3/2)σ/ε. Same answer!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top