Electric field inside a cavity within a sphere

Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


This question has already been asked before. The electric field inside a spherical cavity carved out of a larger sphere is uniform which I have derived. What I don't really understand is that if you construct a gaussian surface inside the cavity, it wouldn't enclose any charge. So, there shouldn't any electric field which is contradictory to my previous results. I think I'm missing a subtle point but can't figure out. Thanks in advance.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the cavity is concentric with the larger sphere, it is uniform - zero.

If the cavity is not concentric, then the thing about the gaussian surface is the fact that you have no enclosed charge means that the NET flux is zero on the surface - not that the flux is zero everywhere. It is not constant over the surface because your problem doesn't have the spherically symmetry necessary.

Here's an intuitive example - two parallel, infinite charged planes. Obviously there's a uniform E-field perpendicular to the planes between them. Construct a gaussian spherical surface between the two planes - no enclosed charge!

That means the net flux through that gaussian sphere is zero - because the flux entering it on one side is the same as the flux exiting it on the other. That does NOT mean the E-field is zero, because again it's not spherically symmetrical so you can't assume the flux is constant over the surface.
 
I get it now. Thanks.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top