Electric field inside at points on a conductive box

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at three points related to a conducting box with excess negative charge. Point a, located outside the box, yields a calculated electric field of approximately -379.7 N/C, but confusion arises regarding why the answer is expected to be positive despite the negative charge. Point b, situated within the thick wall of the box, results in an electric field of 0 N/C, as does point c, which is located inside the cavity. The reasoning highlights that the electric field inside the conductor is zero due to the shielding effect of the charges on the surface. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the distribution of charges and the implications of Gauss' Law in determining electric fields in different regions.
Caiti
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm having trouble understanding a concept.
Given a conducting box with point a located outside the box, point b located within the (thick) wall of the box and point c located within the cavity of the box, I have to calculate the electric field at each of these points.
There is excess negative charge on the box and a surface density of 2.10×10^10 e/m^2.

I managed to figure out all parts, but I struggle to understand why this is the case.


Homework Equations


Gauss' Law: ∫ E.dA = Q/ε_0
Q = Ne


The Attempt at a Solution



For point a:
Q = Ne ∴ Q = 1.6*10^(-19)*-2.10*10^(10) = 3.36*10^-9

∫E.dA = Q/ε_0 = (3.36*10^-9)/(8.85*10^-12) ≈ -379.7 N/C

I know the answer is meant to be positive, but I don't understand how. I believed it would be negative as the charge on the box is negative, and so would 'emit' a negative field.

For point b:
0 N/C because it is inside the walls of the box.

For point c:
I initially thought this would be (+ or -) 379.7 N/C to balance out point a, but found the answer to be 0 N/C. I can't find a reason why this would be, other than that the net charge must be negative; however, I don't see why this couldn't contribute a negative charge in order to increase the magnitude of the net negative charge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For point a, I don't understand exactly what is your question.

For point c think the following. Where are the charges? Are there charges INSIDE the box? The electrical field inside the box is related to the electric charge that is inside the box. Another way to see this is the following. In point b there is no field, so the outside fields become zero in this point, what do you expect to happen as you go to the interior?
 
phpnwW18d.png


Here's a copy of an image explaining where the points are. It has them labelled as 1, 2 and 3, but I used a, b and c respectively.

So with point c, inside, it is determined by point b? I'm sorry, but I don't fully understand

Thank you (=
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top