Electric Field Lines and points

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of electric field lines, specifically how to determine the relationship between points in an electric field and the rules governing the drawing of electric field lines. Participants explore concepts related to electric fields generated by point charges and the visualization of these fields through field lines.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks about the characteristics shared by points on the same electric field line and how to determine if points C and D lie on the same line.
  • Another participant questions whether the original inquiry pertains to electric field lines or equipotential lines and suggests considering the context of the electric field, such as whether it is uniform or due to a point charge.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the difference between points C and D if they are on separate lines and inquires about any rules or equations governing electric field lines.
  • One participant explains that field lines are a visualization tool and do not represent physical entities, emphasizing that field lines can be drawn through any point as long as they are tangent to the electric field vectors.
  • Another participant challenges the idea of arbitrary field lines, stating that certain lines may not be tangent to the electric field vectors and asks for rules regarding vector direction in electric fields.
  • A participant discusses the use of Coulomb's Law to determine the electric field's magnitude and direction at a point due to point charges, suggesting a method for visualizing the electric field through vector addition.
  • Another participant advises against using Coulomb's Law directly for electric fields, recommending the use of the electric field definition for point charges and the superposition principle for multiple charges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of electric field lines and whether there are specific rules governing their direction and drawing. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the ambiguity in the original question and the need for clarity regarding the context of the electric field being discussed. There are also mentions of the limitations of visualizing electric fields and the complexity involved in accurately representing them.

dspp
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Could anyone pls explain to me: what is the similar thing among points in the same Electric Field Line?

(I have 2 particles A and B which are + and -, then I have 2 other ones C and D --> how can I know that C and D are lying in 1 EF line or in 2 different lines?)

Thx so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One clarification: are you sure you are talking about "electric field lines" and not "equipotential lines" ? And furthermore, what is the situation: is this perhaps in a uniform electric field (as in between plates of a capacitor)?

Or is it a field of a point charge. There is no quantity that is constant for two points on the same field line of a point charge, but the direction would be constant (could that be it?)
 
Sorry coz my question was a bit ambiguous.
Pls have a look at the attachment.
What I got stuck is the difference between C and D if they are lying in 2 separate lines.

What I actually want to ask is : is there any rule or any equation for each EL line?

Thx so much.
 

Attachments

  • EL lines.JPG
    EL lines.JPG
    1.9 KB · Views: 543
First, you need to understand what "field lines" are.

Field lines do not really exist. They're just a clever way to visualize a field, but there's nothing physical about a field line.

Think about it this way: at each point in space, you can calculate the electric field, which is a vector. At every point in space, the field has both a direction and a magnitude. You can imagine planting a little vector at each point on a plane, indicating the direction and magnitude of the field at those points.

If you then imagine drawing a line through that field of vectors, so that the vectors are everywhere tangent to the line, you're drawing a field line.

The upshot of this is that you can draw a field line through any arbitrary point. There isn't some finite number of field lines, or some equations which govern them (except for the condition that a field line is everywhere tangent to the field vectors). If you pick any point in the plane, you can draw a field line through that point.

Here's an applet that will help make this clear:

http://www.slcc.edu/schools/hum_sci/physics/tutor/2220/e_fields/java/

First, you can add a positive and negative charge to the plane. Next, select "Draw a field line" and start clicking. A field line will be drawn through the point you chose. With a little practice, you can make a picture that looks just like the one on your assignment.

- Warren
 
Thx for your answer.
However, I still feel unsatisfied with it.
For ex, in my attachment, we have A(+) and B(-). With another article C, how to draw an EL line through C?

From the textbook or other sources I've ever read, they just draw like (1). Why don't we draw like (2)? Can we drwa whatever we want? Coz in 2 cases, the direction of C is still the tangent of the EL line.
 

Attachments

  • ELlines.JPG
    ELlines.JPG
    2.4 KB · Views: 532
The problem is that a line like (2) is not everywhere tanget to the electric field vectors.

- Warren
 
So there must be some rules about the direction of vectors in Electric Field? Sth like the "continuity of direction", otherwise I could say that line 2 (or any other line) is everywhere tangent in the EF.
And if there is a rule, what is it?
 
The electric field itself (its magnitude and direction at all points in space) can be found by e.g. Coulomb's or Gauss' law; the field lines are just a way to visualize the field.

You could, in principle, draw any arbitrary field line, and then find a distribution of charges that would satisfy it, but that's a difficult problem that isn't normally done.

In the case of line number (2), there are only two charges present, and the field due to those two charges alone cannot look that way.

- Warren
 
Field Lines and Coulomb's Law

You can use Coulomb's Law, F= k*q(a)*q(c)/ r^2 to determine the magnitude of the force on q(c) due to charge a, and depending on the sign of both it will either be attractive or repulsive, pointing along the line that joins the two (either inward or outward respectively). If the second charge isn't known, even better, this will give you the field strength and direction due to charge 'a' at that point.

Now, you must do the same thing at the same point in space for the other charge in your system, which you have labelled charge b.

You now have two vectors. Add them using vector addition methods, and this will tell you the direction your field points (and it's magnitude, which you don't seem particularly concerned about at this point).

No for the fun part. Do that very same thing for every point in the space surrounding your two charges. Notice that for small changes in position, the resultant vector direction (generally) doesn't change much. By smoothly connecting all of these vectors such that each is tangent to the connecting line, you have a representation of the electric field.

Torch.
 
  • #10
Original Torch,

You don't really want to use Coulomb's law directly, since it involves the force between two charges. You should just use the definition of the electric field due to a point charge:

E = \frac{kq}{r^2}

You can superpose (add) two or more electric fields due to each point charges to find the total field.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K