Electric Field of a single charge vs 2 charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why only the positive charge (Q) contributes to the electric field in configurations involving two charges, such as concentric spheres or parallel plates. It is explained that when applying Gauss's Law, only charges within the Gaussian surface affect the electric field, which is why the negative charge (-Q) is not considered in certain calculations. In the case of parallel plates, the electric fields from the two oppositely charged plates cancel outside the plates but add together inside, leading to a net electric field. The importance of charge direction is emphasized, as it determines the resultant field's behavior. Overall, the contributions of charges to the electric field depend on their arrangement and the application of Gauss's Law.
Poop-Loops
Messages
731
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



So up till now we had problems where there was some sort of charge (line, surface, volume, point) and you pretty much had to find the electric field at some point (or as a function of some distance) or the same with voltage.

Now, I have to calculate the capacitance between to things (irrelevant what, it's not my problem) and looking at the examples from the book they say something like:

Two concentric spheres (one inside of the other, right?) have a charge of Q and -Q. Then they say that the electric field between them is Q/4pi(r^2).

Okay... how come only Q contributes to the field and not -Q?

Same thing with 2 plates, one Q and the other -Q, only Q is used for the electric field and -Q is ignored. I'm not understanding why...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, it's all in the epsilons from Gauss' law...

I must have misunderrepresented the question.
 
your first question; why doesn't -Q contribute to the E field, the anwer is simple E field is force per coulomb first find the force it is Q^2/4pi R^2 then divide it by Q, second you asked the parallel plate capacitor, when you are trying to find the E field of an infinite sheet of charge you will find Q/2.(epsilon) each side of the plane but when you bring another plate with a -Q charge the charges will accumulate on one side of the conductors this is why you don't consider -Q's contribution, it would become the macroscopic example of coulomb's law for 2 particles
 
Hmm...memow's explanation isn't quite correct.

In the first case, simply apply Gauss's Law using a sphere in between the two spheres as your Gaussian surface. Note that the only contribution is from charges inside the Gaussian surface; therefore, the field between the spheres depends only on the inner sphere.

In the second case, what actually happens is a neat cancellation. Remember that the field of an infinite conducting plane is

E = \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0}

where the direction of E is away from the plane (or towards the plane, if \sigma < 0). The direction of E is important, because what you're doing is putting two oppositely charged planes side by side:

Code:
      |      |
  E1  |  E1  |  E1
 <--- | ---> | --->
      |      | 
  E2  |  E2  |  E2
 ---> | ---> | <---
      |      |

Note that, outside the planes, E1 and E2 have opposite directions, and therefore they add to zero. Inside the planes, E1 and E2 have the same direction, so

E = E_1 + E_2 = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} + \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}

so in this case, the charge -Q does affect the resultant field.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top