Electric field of a spherical metal shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field of a spherical metal shell with charge per unit area sigma and radius R, at a distance x from its surface. The formula proposed for the electric field is (4*pi*k*R*σ)/((R+x)^2), although it is suggested to use ε0 instead of k for clarity. The relationship between charge density and total charge is also noted, with σ defined as Q/(4*pi*R^2). Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct variables in the formula. The conversation highlights the need for precision in physics calculations and the use of constants.
baker265
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spherical metal shell has charge per unit area sigma and radius R. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance x from the surface of the sphere? You may include only these variables in your formula: sigma, R, epsilon_0, x


Homework Equations


σ=Q/(4*pi*R^2)
k=1/(4*pi*epsilon_0)


The Attempt at a Solution


(4*pi*k*R*σ)/((R+x)^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
baker265 said:

Homework Statement


A spherical metal shell has charge per unit area sigma and radius R. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance x from the surface of the sphere? You may include only these variables in your formula: sigma, R, epsilon_0, x

Homework Equations


σ=Q/(4*pi*R^2)
k=1/(4*pi*epsilon_0)

The Attempt at a Solution


(4*pi*k*R*σ)/((R+x)^2)
That looks good, but I think the problem calls for you to use ε0 rather than k .
 
Cool! Was there a question in there?

Note:
Your reasoning and working is usually helpful to answering questions.
The permittivity of free space is an allowed "variable" but it is actually a constant ...
I take it you used k to save typing?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top