Electric field of a uniformly distributed rod

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field generated by a uniformly distributed rod with a total charge of -Q for x > -a and +Q for x < a. The user derived the expression for the electric field E at a point (x, 0) on the x-axis, resulting in E = 2KQ/a[1/x^2 - 1/(x-a)^2]. The user seeks clarification on the integration process and the application of symmetry in the calculation, particularly when transitioning to the second Taylor expansion term for the case where x >> a.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansions
  • Proficiency in using Coulomb's law, particularly E = KQ/r^2
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Study the application of Taylor series expansions in physics problems
  • Explore the concept of linear charge density and its implications in electrostatics
  • Investigate the symmetry properties in electric field calculations for different charge configurations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone involved in solving electrostatic problems involving charge distributions.

tongpu
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


rod -a-------|---------a on x-axis, for x>-a has -Q charge, for X<a has +Q charge, find the electric field at point (x,0) x is positive


Homework Equations


lambda = Q/a linear charge density dQ = (lambda)(ds)
E=KQ/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


i make dE=kdQ/(x-s)^2
integrate kdQ/(x-s)^2 between -a and a ( i can make it 0 to a and multiply by two, symmetry)
i get the result 2KQ/a[1/x^2 - 1/(x-a)^2] for E sub-x

now if i want to find x>>a i need o somehow change [1/x^2 - 1/(x-a)^2] to the 2nd taylor expansion term but how? And is my integration correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest checking the assumption about symmetry.
 
I don't understand how you multiplied by 2... you have the integral:

[tex]\int_{-a}^{0}\frac{k\sigma ds}{(x-s)^2} + \int_{0}^{a}\frac{-k\sigma ds}{(x-s)^2}[/tex]

where sigma is Q/a
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K