Electric Field of Moving Charge: Effects on Distance

jartsa
Messages
1,582
Reaction score
141
First I stand next to a point charge, then I start moving away or towards the charge, which causes the charge to be further away from me according to me (my ruler contracts according to an inertial observer), and as electric field of a point charge decreases with distance, the electric field caused by the charge decreases at my position according to me.

Is that above thing right or wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jartsa said:
then I start moving away or towards the charge,
So which one?

jartsa said:
which causes the charge to be further away from me according to me (length contraction)
How would length contraction increase the distance to the charge?
 
A.T. said:
So which one?

Let's study both cases, first the easier one, whichever that is.

How would length contraction increase the distance to the charge?

Simple case: Bell's spaceships. Distance increases according to accelerating spaceships.
Complicated case: Bell's spaceships, but one spaceship is out of fuel, but that does not prevent the other spaceship from observing the Bell's spaceship type of change of distance.
 
jartsa said:
Bell's spaceships, but one spaceship is out of fuel, but that does not prevent the other spaceship from observing the Bell's spaceship type of change of distance.
If one ship doesn't accelerate (corresponding to the charge in your question?), the one behind it will crash into it. That is hardly an increase in distance.
 
You're forgetting the relativity of simultaneity. Put yourself at the origin and the charge at x=X. At time t=0 you accelerate instantaneously to velocity v. Plug the numbers into the Lorentz transforms. Yes, at t=0 the charge is at ##x'=\gamma X##. However, at t'=0, which is your current simultaneity convention, it is at ##x'=X/\gamma## - closer to you. For non-instantaneous acceleration you'd have to specify an acceleration profile to figure out how far you and the charge move during your acceleration phase.

You need to take a look at the electromagnetic tensor (see for example equation 1.58 in Carroll's GR notes - apologies for lack of link, but my phone is not cooperating with linking today) to determine what field you will see.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top