Electric field on a tapered cylinder?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the electric field behavior around a tapered cylinder acting as a capacitor, where a rod with a taper is placed inside a grounded cylinder. When a voltage of +100V is applied to the larger end of the rod, the voltage at the tapered point is questioned, particularly regarding charge density and electric field enhancement. It is noted that the smaller surface area at the tapered point will lead to a higher charge density, thus increasing the local electric field. Calculating the charge at this point is complex, with suggestions to use moment methods or refer to advanced solutions in electromagnetic theory. The conversation highlights the intricacies of electric fields in geometrically varying structures.
HMS-776
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Electric field on a tapered cylinder?

I have a rod which is 1" in diameter, and 4 inches long, the last inch of one side of the rod tapers down to a point of 1/10th inch (.01).

The rod also has a cylinder which it fits in, which has a taper which follows the rods taper exactly. There is a gap between the rod and cylinder through the whole length of .01

cylinder.jpg


If a voltage were applied to the large diameter end of the inner rod of +100V. And the (outer) cylinder was grounded, What would the voltage be at the point which is 1/10th the diameter of the large end?

Since the rod and cylinder essentially form a capacitor, would the smallest area (tapered point) have the largest charge? Would the charge be magnified, or greater than the applied charge because of the reduced area?

How could the charge at the point be calculated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


My answer to any general calculating charge question is to use a moment method. There are usually closed form approximations you can make but since you are interested in the behaviour of the field around the taper then I do not know of any easy way of doing it via closed form. Maybe there is a way, I am not aware of it. But the point is going to give rise to field enhancement. The charge density there is going to be higher due to the smaller surface area and this is going to increase the electric field local to the point.
 


There are closed form - or nearly so - solutions, but they are far from trivial. See Section 3.4 of Jackson.

I sure hope you like hypergeometric functions!
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top