Electric field outside the plates of a capacitor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric field outside the plates of a parallel plate capacitor, particularly focusing on the behavior of the electric field near the edges and the implications of finite versus infinite plates. Participants explore theoretical aspects, derivations, and conceptual clarifications related to the electric field in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether there is any electric field outside the region between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor, suggesting that the positive and negative charges only appear on one side of each plate.
  • Others argue that while infinite parallel planes of opposite charge would have no field outside, real capacitors with finite plates do exhibit a nonzero electric field outside due to the proximity of the plates.
  • Participants discuss the concept of edge effects, noting that these can be ignored in simple derivations but may be included for a more accurate representation of the field.
  • There is a contention regarding the behavior of the electric field at points near the plates, with some asserting that fields from the plates tend to cancel outside but reinforce between them.
  • One participant raises a question about the independence of the electric field from distance, suggesting that for finite plates, the field should be zero away from the edges, while others clarify that the field is indeed dependent on the distance for finite plates.
  • Another participant introduces a mathematical approach to understanding the electric field from circular plates, discussing the integration of forces contributed by uniformly distributed charge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and behavior of the electric field outside capacitor plates, with no consensus reached on whether the field is zero or nonzero due to edge effects. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of finite versus infinite plates.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the uniformity of charge distribution and the idealization of infinite plates, which may not hold in practical scenarios. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the mathematical treatment of electric fields in different configurations.

zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0
Is there any electric field outside the region between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor? What about near the edges? Do we neglect that variation in deriving an expression for the field inside?
The positive and negative charges appear only on one side of each plate so I don't think there should be any field outside.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there were two infinite parallel planes of opposite charge, there would be a field inside them, but not outside them. You can tell this because, assuming you know the derivation for a single plane of charge, you can find the field for two planes by superposition of the solutions, and the fields of oppositely charged plates cancel outside, but reinforce each other between the plates.

In reality, there is a nonzero field outside the plates of a capacitor because the plates are not infinite. A charged particle near the plates would experience a stronger force from the closer plate that is not totally canceled out by the farther one.

And to answer your other question, edge effects are ignored when deriving the simple expression for the field between parallel plates of charge you are probably referring to, but they can also be taken into account to give a more complicated expression.
 
LeonhardEuler said:
and the fields of oppositely charged plates cancel outside, but reinforce each other between the plates.

I did not get this point.
Refer the figure:

attachment.php?attachmentid=32021&stc=1&d=1297121949.jpg


At the point P (not far away from the positive plate), there is a net electric field towards left.
There is a net electric field towards right at the point Q.
(btw do we consider the charge on one side of negative plate to find the electric field at Q? Or is it isolated from Q?)
LeonhardEuler said:
but they can also be taken into account to give a more complicated expression.

Wow...we can derive the field near the edges too? Never knew that.
 

Attachments

  • cap.jpg
    cap.jpg
    5 KB · Views: 5,522
What I mean is that, at the point P, the field from the positive plate pushes to the left, and the negative one pushed to the right, so the fields tend to cancel in this region. In between the plates, the positive plate pushes to the right and the negative one pulls to the right, so the fields reinforce.

If the plates were infinite, the two plates would completely cancel each other outside the region between the plates.
 
My figure was incorrect. There should not be any positive charges on the left side of the left plate. I understood you now.

LeonhardEuler said:
In reality, there is a nonzero field outside the plates of a capacitor because the plates are not infinite. A charged particle near the plates would experience a stronger force from the closer plate that is not totally canceled out by the farther one.

Now I don't understand this point :biggrin:
Can't we apply this explanation of yours to the above statement? -

"at the point P, the field from the positive plate pushes to the left, and the negative one pushed to the right, so the fields tend to cancel in this region. In between the plates, the positive plate pushes to the right and the negative one pulls to the right, so the fields reinforce."
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
Can't we apply this explanation of yours to the above statement? -

"at the point P, the field from the positive plate pushes to the left, and the negative one pushed to the right, so the fields tend to cancel in this region. In between the plates, the positive plate pushes to the right and the negative one pulls to the right, so the fields reinforce."

Yes, but the key is "tend to cancel". They don't completely cancel for finite plates.
 
The electric field due to a plate of the capacitor is independent of the distance from it (its uniform) provided its not infinite. So if the finite identical plates have uniform charge density, away from the edges outside the capacitor the field should be 0.

Are you saying that non-zero electric field is due to increased/decreased field due to edge effects ?
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
The electric field due to a plate of the capacitor is independent of the distance from it (its uniform) provided its not infinite. So if the finite identical plates have uniform charge density, away from the edges outside the capacitor the field should be 0.

Are you saying that non-zero electric field is due to increased/decreased field due to edge effects ?

You have that backwards: The electric field is independent of distance only when the plates are infinite. Otherwise a capacitor on another planet would produce the same effect here as nearby one.
 
By infinite I meant infinite distance from the plates (not infinite plate).
How do you prove that the field at a nearby point outside the capacitor is not 0?
 
  • #10
The case of circular plates is simplest. Suppose the charge is uniformly distributed. Look at the force at some place directly above the center of the plate. There is force contributed by all the imaginary rings around the central point on the plate, and all the force from within one narrow ring is uniformly distributed around that ring. To find the total force we need to integrate along the parameter theta, which is the angle from the normal of the plane, to the edge of the plate. So there will be some function to integrate, which will be the z-component of the force:
F_{tot} = \int_{0}^{\theta_{MAX}}g(\theta)d\theta
We don't need to know what form g has. The only important thing is that each ring contributes something to the force, and the sign is the same. For a positive plate the field will be away from the plate.

Now look at a plate farther down from this one. The integral is exactly the same, but \theta_{MAX} is less. So the force must be less.
 
  • #11
hmmm...I understood it clearly now.
Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K