Electric field outside two concentric sphere's

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the electric field outside two concentric spheres, it is clarified that the field between the inner positively charged sphere (P) and the outer grounded sphere (Q) is constant but not homogeneous. The field outside sphere Q is zero due to the cancellation of the positive charge from P and the negative charge induced on Q, which is grounded. Gauss' Law is used to explain that while the field inside P is zero, the field inside Q is not zero because it encloses charge. The potential of the grounded sphere Q is zero, resulting from the influence of the electric field created by P. Overall, the key takeaway is that the electric field behaves differently inside and outside the spheres due to grounding and charge distribution.
bulbanos
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
We've got two concentric metallic spheres, let's say P and Q
P is the smallest one, so its inside Q
Q is grounded and P is positive charged

I figured out that the field in between P and Q is not homogeneous but constant. But why is the field outside Q zero while it is not inside Q? Still the field is zero inside P because of the Gauss' Law...
I just don't see the profound difference between the two spheres.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the field in between P and Q is not homogeneous but constant.

You sure it is constant? :confused: I don't think so... a paralleled metal plate will riase a constant E field in between, but not for a concentric sphere.. You may want to check your calcultion, the field should be similar to a point charge in free space :approve:

But why is the field outside Q zero while it is not inside Q? Still the field is zero inside P because of the Gauss' Law...

The field inside the Q is not zero is also because of gauss law.. draw an gaussian surface in between P and Q, the charge enclosed in the gaussian surface is surely not zero, Q_{enclosed}/ \epsilon = \int \vec{E} d \vec{S}.. so how could \vec{E} be zero?

why is the field outside Q zero

Q carries negative charge and P carries positive charge.. and there E field cancels out.. Question: Where did the negative charge come from?
 
Last edited:
If "constant" means "does not vary in time" (after equilibrium, obviously) then bulbanos is right. After equilibrium there is an electroSTATIC field.

The external sphere is grounded then V_Q=0. But this sphere is in the electrical field created by P (q/4/pi/eps_0/R_Q). R_Q is the radius of external sphere In order to have a zero potential, external sphere will get -q from Earth and will have its own potential -q/4/pi/eps_0/R_Q. The total potential of Q will be now given by the sum between the potential of the field from P and the potential from its own field that is 0.

In any external point, the field is zero because the electrical charge inside the Gaussian surface containing this point is 0: q+(-q)=0. (see the post of vincentchan for the Gauss' law)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top