Electric field polarization in different stations

AI Thread Summary
Electric field polarization varies among AM, FM, and TV broadcast stations, with AM stations typically using vertical polarization due to their mast or T aerials, which favor low-angle radiation. FM broadcasts in Britain historically employed horizontal polarization for aesthetic reasons and ease of installation, while modern practices often use slant or circular polarization to enhance reception for both home and portable devices. TV stations can utilize either polarization, as the shorter wavelengths minimize the impact of ground reflections, and a mix of horizontal and vertical orientations helps reduce interference. The orientation of the receiving antenna is crucial, as a vertical transmitter requires a vertical receiver, while circular polarization allows for more flexibility in antenna orientation. Understanding these polarization characteristics is essential for optimizing reception in various environments.
Gizew
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
evelam00@gmail.com how is the electric field from AM broadcast stations polarized? from TV stations? from FM broad cast stations? is there any cionnection between this polarization and orientation of receiving antenna?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
AM stations are vertical. The aerials are usually mast radiators or T aerials. This gives low angle radiation. A hozirontal dipole would fire too much radiation at a steep angle due to ground reflections.

At VHF and UHF there is no deep technical reason why either should be used. The choice is more of convenience. It is said Horizontal can be a bit better over hilly areas and where there are a lot of trees but it may be marginal or just a theory.

TV is either. As the wavelength is so much shorter you can get transmitting aerials many wavelengths above ground and ground reflections have little effect. A mixture of hor and vert is used to reduced interference.

In Britain FM was horizontal because it was intended for home use and roof yagi aerials are easier to mount horizontally and look neater. These days slant or circular (both sometimes called 'mixed') is used to accommodate both home listeners and people in cars. It is also better for portable sets with telescopic aerials. Circular allows reception with the receiving aerial at any angle.


A vert transmitting aerial requires a vertical receiving one. Circular polarisation requires both ends to be phased in order for the electric vector to rotate in same direction but broadcasting receiving aerials tend to simple hor or vert or at at any angle.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top