Electric Field Problem: Solving for E in a System of Oppositely Charged Plates

AI Thread Summary
In a system of two large, parallel metal plates with opposite surface charge densities of 17.0*10^-22, the electric field (E) in the outer regions of both plates is zero due to the cancellation of their electric fields. This cancellation occurs because the electric fields from the plates are uniform and equal in magnitude, despite the distances not being equidistant. The electric field from a single large sheet of charge is given by E = sigma/2×vacuum permittivity, and since the plates have opposite charges, their fields only add together in the space between them. The importance of the plates being "large" lies in the uniformity of the electric field they produce, which is valid except near the edges. Thus, the net electric field outside the plates remains zero.
Prashasti
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
Question : Two large, thin metal plates are parallel and close to each other. On their inner faces, the plates have surface charge densities of opposite signs and of magnitude 17.0*10^-22. What is E (Electric field) : (a) in the outer region of the first plate, (b) in the outer region of the second plate?

Answer: According to the book, answers are (a) 0 (b) 0 And the reason they've given is - "Net electric field is Zero because electric fields due to both the plates will cancel out each other".

My objection : How? How do they cancel each other's effect when that particular region is NOT EQUIDISTANT from each other, and as Electric field varies inversely with the square of distance, HOW ARE THEY EQUAL IN MAGNITUDE?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
...as Electric field varies inversely with the square of distance
... this is only correct for sherical charge distributions - i.e. a sphere or a point charge.

Why is it important that the plates are "large"?

The electric field from two sheets of charge like that is the sum of the fields due to the single sheets alone.
What is the electric field due to a single large sheet of charge?
 
I got it. Thank you so much. I think it is E = sigma/2×vacuum permittivity?!
 
Well done - yeah: the field due to a large plate (except near the edges) is uniform.
Since the plates have opposite signs, their fields cancel everywhere except in between them (and by the edges) where they add together.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top