Electric Field Question: Finding Zero Points for Point Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding points where the electric field is zero for a system of point charges. The initial attempt involved setting the electric field contributions from a positive and a negative charge equal to each other, leading to a calculated distance that differed from the textbook answer. Participants clarified the concept of electric field behavior near point charges, noting that the field approaches infinity as one gets closer to the charges. The conversation highlighted the importance of understanding the directional nature of electric fields, especially in regions between the charges. Ultimately, the discussion resolved with a clearer understanding of the conditions for zero electric field points.
altegron
Messages
14
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/8125/chapter23number13qh8.png

Homework Equations



E = {k}_{e} \frac{q} {r^2}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured that the electric field vector from the negative point charge would have to cancel out the electric field vector from the positive point charge so I said that 0 = E from the negative + E from the positive. I substituted values in and made the distance for the positive one r and the distance for the negative one (1-r). When I solved this for r, I get an answer like 1.03m, but the book says the answer is 1.82m to the left of the negative charge.

Even if I did the math wrong, what I am really wondering about it is the concept here. To me it seems like there should be 4 points where the field is 0. 1. At infinity, which the book mentions. 2. Somewhere far to the left of the negative charge, which I guess is the answer they put in the back. 3. Just slightly to the left of the negative charge. 4. And just slightly right of the negative charge.

My thinking on 3 and 4 is that E will get bigger and bigger as you get closer to the point (r->0, so E goes to infinity, right?). So, E will be large and positive close to the (+) charge, but as you go left to the (-) charge it will decrease to 0, and then become more negative as it reaches the (-) charge. Once it passes this, it will get bigger (from -infinity) until it equalizes with the (+) charge. Then, when you are rather far away it will be 0 again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
altegron said:
3. Just slightly to the left of the negative charge. 4. And just slightly right of the negative charge.

My thinking on 3 and 4 is that E will get bigger and bigger as you get closer to the point (r->0, so E goes to infinity, right?). So, E will be large and positive close to the (+) charge, but as you go left to the (-) charge it will decrease to 0, and then become more negative as it reaches the (-) charge. Once it passes this, it will get bigger (from -infinity) until it equalizes with the (+) charge. Then, when you are rather far away it will be 0 again.

Re 3: How can the field add up to zero, both "far to the left"(not infinity) and "slightly to the left" of the negative charge? Only one can be true.

And as for 4, what are the directions of the electric fields at a point between the charges (along the line joining them)?
 
neutrino said:
Re 3: How can the field add up to zero, both "far to the left"(not infinity) and "slightly to the left" of the negative charge? Only one can be true.

And as for 4, what are the directions of the electric fields at a point between the charges (along the line joining them)?

Ohhhh I get it now! Thanks for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top