Electric Field Strength of 10cm x 10cm Charged Copper Plate

  • Thread starter Thread starter maccha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field strength of a 10 cm x 10 cm charged copper plate with 1.0 x 10^10 electrons. The formula used is Electric field = n/Eo, where n represents surface charge density and Eo is the permittivity constant. While the model for an infinite plane of charge yields correct results at the plate's surface, the approximation may not hold as one moves away from the plate. Gauss' law can be applied effectively due to symmetry, but for a finite plate, the direction of the electric field becomes uncertain without additional assumptions. Ultimately, the approximation can be valid if the distance from the plate is very small.
maccha
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
A thin, horizontal 10 cm x 10 cm copper plate is charged with 1.0 x 10^10 electrons. If the electrons are uniformly distributed on the surface, what is the strength of the electric field?

I initially went to use the formula given in the text for a conductor where

Electric field=n/Eo

where n is the surface charge density and Eo is the permittivity constant

. I can only get the right answer if I model it as an infinite plane of charge, though. Can you assume that this works even though it's so small?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maccha said:
I initially went to use the formula given in the text for a conductor where

Electric field=n/Eo

where n is the surface charge density and Eo is the permittivity constant
That's the equation for the field between a pair of oppositely-charged plates. For a single plate, the field is 1/2 as much.

. I can only get the right answer if I model it as an infinite plane of charge, though. Can you assume that this works even though it's so small?
Yes. You will get the correct E-field right at the surface of the plate. (Moving away from the plate, E will become smaller, unlike the infinite plane case.)
 
Gauss' law works due to symmetry. If the surface is not symmetric, such as 10x10 plate; then you don't know the direction of the electric field so it wouldn't work. (Unless you can use the approximation that distance is very small).
If the surface was infinite plane you know the direction of electric field will be point up/down so you can use gauss law very easily.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top