Electric Fields, Insulators, Conductors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total charge on the inner and outer surfaces of a hollow conducting sphere using Gauss's law. The inner charge is identified as -3.928e-9, while the outer charge is 8.15698e-9. Participants clarify that the total charge on the conductor is the sum of the charges on its inner and outer surfaces. By applying a Gaussian surface, the user determines the total charge on the inner surface as 3.928e-9 and calculates the outer surface charge as 4.22898e-9. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding electric fields and charge distribution in conductors.
Aerospace
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I am going to attach the question along with this post so that you guys can see the questions and the diagram and be able to help me in answering my question better.
I found the ccharge on the inner sphere and it is -3.928e-9 and the charge on the outer sphere is 8.15698e-9.
Now I have to find the total charge on the inner and outer surface of the hollow conducting sphere.
I'm not sure why it is any different from the charge on the outer sphere written above. If someone could help me by explaining and helping me set up the problem, it would be DEFINITELY appreciated. Thanks.

I love this forum, people always come through :)
 

Attachments

  • phys.jpg
    phys.jpg
    19.7 KB · Views: 770
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you find the charges on the spheres?

Consider a guassian surface at three different radii:
- just outside the insulator (I assume this is how you found the charge on the inner surface)
- outside the conducting sphere (What charge would that give?)
- and one inside the conducting sphere (What's the field there?)
 
I still don't understand...
I found the charge on the insulating sphere using the formula (E)(Eo)(SA of sphere)=-q
E is the electric field, Eo is Epsilon naught, SA is Surface Area, and the negative in front of q (charge) is because the electric field is radially inward.

For the conducting sphere, I used (Ec)(Eo)(SAc of sphere)=Q-q
Where Ec is Electric field for the conductor, Eo is epsilon naught, SAc is Surface Area of conducting sphere, Q is charge on the conductor and q is the inside charge of the conducting sphere...


So my initial question was, what's the difference between the charge on the conductor and the charge on the inner and outer surface of the conducting sphere? because I have to find the total charge on both of those.
 
Originally posted by Aerospace
For the conducting sphere, I used (Ec)(Eo)(SAc of sphere)=Q-q
Where Ec is Electric field for the conductor, Eo is epsilon naught, SAc is Surface Area of conducting sphere, Q is charge on the conductor and q is the inside charge of the conducting sphere...
Gauss's law gives you the total charge within the surface. Setting this equal to Q - q, means that Q is the total charge on the conducting sphere: including both inner and outer surfaces.
So my initial question was, what's the difference between the charge on the conductor and the charge on the inner and outer surface of the conducting sphere? because I have to find the total charge on both of those.
I don't understand your question. The total charge on anything is the sum of all the charges. For a conductor, this is the sum of the charge on its inner and outer surfaces.

What's the charge on the inner surface? Use a Gaussian surface in the interior of the conductor and see what the net charge must be. (It's trivial.)
 
Figured it out :) Thanks

Thank you so much. I used your idea of using the Gaussian surface and therefore, the total charge on the inner surface is therefore q, which is 3.928e-9 and the total charge on the outer surface is Q-q which is 8.15698e-9 - 3.928e-9 = 4.22898e-9

Yay...haha...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top