Electric force and influence

  • #1
Physics0001
4
0
Hi,

I'm dealing with a more or less trivial question. Let's have a look on two situations.

  1. Consider a (negative) charged metal plate. If the plate is infinit in size it will produce a perfekt homogeneous electric field. If we now place a second plate parallel to the first one the electric field will influnce (positive) charge on the surface of the second plate. In an excersie they say that there is no resulting electric force attached to the second plate since the field is homogeneous and the force resulting from the field on the positive surface charge will be compensated by the force to the negative surface charge influenced on the other sied of the second plate.
  2. If we rub a plastic foil on some cloths it gets also charged. According to the gaussian law the electric field should also be homogeneous. After putting it onto the wall it will stick on the wall due the influnced charged and the electric force.
What is the difference between the two situations? why do we have a force in one but not in the other situation? Has this to do with the fact that the wall is an insulator so that this is an effect of a dielectric?

Thanks for your help.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
Physics0001
4
0
But what about the fact that the electric field of the charged plate is uniform? The force attached to every point is equal in direction and magnitude. So the resulting force should be zero?

In case 1 of course there's a force on the 2nd plate. To keep it at a fixed distance you need to compensate this force by fixing the plate. You get the force per unit area by evaluating the Maxwell stress tensor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell_stress_tensor

I'm not sure how to use this if we have a charged and an uncharged plate. Can you give more details?
 
  • #4
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
22,060
12,958
Well, if you have a plate with positive charge and a negative charge, how can these plates not attract each other?

Take two infinite conducting plates parallel to the 12-plane of a Cartesian coordinate system one with positive surface charge density ##\sigma>0## at ##z=0## and one with surface charge density ##-\sigma<0##. The electric field is easily calculated by symmetry to be only within the plates, ##\vec{E}=\vec{e}_3\sigma/\epsilon_0##.

The Maxwell stress tensor is
$$T_{ij}=\epsilon_0 E_i E_j -\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 \vec{E}^2 \delta_{ij}$$
The force per unit on the lower plate with unit-normal vector ##\vec{n}=\vec{e}_3## is given by
$$T_i=T_{ij} n_j=\epsilon_0 E_i E_3 - \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 \vec{E}^2 \delta_{i3}$$
or
$$\vec{T}=\frac{1}{2 \epsilon_0} \sigma^2 \vec{e}_3.$$
As expected the force (per unit area) on the lower plate is upwards. A similar calculate for the upper plate gives the same force per unit area in the opposite direction (as it must be by symmetry).
 
  • #5
jartsa
1,563
134
If we rub a plastic foil on some cloths it gets also charged. According to the gaussian law the electric field should also be homogeneous. After putting it onto the wall it will stick on the wall due the influnced charged and the electric force.

So the charged foil clings to the wall. So there must be an electric field that attracts the charged foil.

Hmm well, the wall is quite thick and not infinitely tall and wide. And the wall is connected to a huge ball, the earth. So I would say that because of those reasons the charges in the wall create an electric field and the charged foil experiences a force ##E*q## in that electric field.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Physics0001
4
0
Well, if you have a plate with positive charge and a negative charge, how can these plates not attract each other?

Take two infinite conducting plates parallel to the 12-plane of a Cartesian coordinate system one with positive surface charge density ##\sigma>0## at ##z=0## and one with surface charge density ##-\sigma<0##. The electric field is easily calculated by symmetry to be only within the plates, ##\vec{E}=\vec{e}_3\sigma/\epsilon_0##.

The Maxwell stress tensor is
$$T_{ij}=\epsilon_0 E_i E_j -\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 \vec{E}^2 \delta_{ij}$$
The force per unit on the lower plate with unit-normal vector ##\vec{n}=\vec{e}_3## is given by
$$T_i=T_{ij} n_j=\epsilon_0 E_i E_3 - \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 \vec{E}^2 \delta_{i3}$$
or
$$\vec{T}=\frac{1}{2 \epsilon_0} \sigma^2 \vec{e}_3.$$
As expected the force (per unit area) on the lower plate is upwards. A similar calculate for the upper plate gives the same force per unit area in the opposite direction (as it must be by symmetry).
But in your example both plates are charged with ##\vert \sigma>0\vert##. In my example the lower plate has a charge density ##-\sigma>0## an the upper plate has ##\sigma_0 = 0##. So the situation is asymmetric per se.
 
  • #7
Physics0001
4
0
So the charged foil clings to the wall. So there must be an electric field that attracts the charged foil.

Hmm well, the wall is quite thick and not infinitely tall and wide. And the wall is connected to a huge ball, the earth. So I would say that because of those reasons the charges in the wall create an electric field and the charged foil experiences a force ##E*q## in that electric field.

The charge is influenced like in situation 1. But since the wall is a dielectric it depends on the polarisation which value the influenced charge density has.
 

Suggested for: Electric force and influence

Replies
5
Views
416
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
345
Replies
4
Views
352
Replies
14
Views
465
Replies
9
Views
343
Replies
9
Views
545
Replies
3
Views
329
Replies
2
Views
668
Replies
4
Views
548
Replies
25
Views
501
Top